Identifying latent subtypes of symptom trajectories in major depressive disorder patients and their predictors

Fanyu Meng,Wenwen Ou,Xiaotian Zhao,Mi Wang,Xiaowen Lu,Qiangli Dong,Liang Zhang,Jinrong Sun,Hua Guo,Futao Zhao,Mei Huang,Mohan Ma,Guanyi Lv,Yaqi Qin,Weihui Li,Zexuan Li,Mei Liao,Li Zhang,Jin Liu,Bangshan Liu,Yumeng Ju,Yan Zhang,Lingjiang Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01883-z
2024-09-02
Abstract:This study aimed to identify different symptom trajectories based on the severity of depression symptoms within a 2-month follow-up, and to explore predictive factors for different symptom trajectories. Three hundred and ninety-two adults diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) were recruited from two longitudinal cohorts. Patients received antidepressant treatment as usual, and the depression symptoms were evaluated by the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD-17) at baseline, two weeks, and eight weeks. Based on the HAMD-17 scores, different trajectories of symptom change were distinguished by applying Growth Mixture Modeling (GMM). Furthermore, the baseline sociodemographic, clinical, and cognitive characteristics were compared to identify potential predictors for different trajectories. Through GMM, three unique depressive symptom trajectories of MDD patients were identified: (1) mild-severity class with significant improvement (Mild, n = 255); (2) high-severity class with significant improvement (High, n = 39); (3) moderate-severity class with limited improvement (Limited, n = 98). Among the three trajectories, the Mild class had a relatively low level of anxiety symptoms at baseline, whereas the High class had the lowest education level and the worst cognitive performance. Additionally, participants in the Limited class exhibited an early age of onset and experienced a higher level of emotional abuse. MDD patients could be categorised into three distinct latent subtypes through different symptom trajectories in this study, and the characteristics of these subtype patients may inform identifications for trajectory-specific intervention targets.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?