Impact of clinical consequences of pulp involvement due to caries on oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Patricia Papoula Gorni Reis,Roberta Costa Jorge,Guido Artemio Marañón-Vásquez,Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo,Lucianne Cople Maia,Vera Mendes Soviero
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000541027
2024-09-02
Abstract:Introduction: Dental caries with pulp involvement potentially impacts the oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether clinical consequences of pulp involvement due to dental caries impacts OHRQoL of children and adolescents. Methods: Observational studies evaluating children/adolescents (Population) with pulp involvement due to caries (Exposition) compared with those without it (Comparison) have more negative impact on their OHRQoL (Outcome). A systematic search was undertaken in August 2022 in seven databases. Alerts were set until August 2023. JBI Critical Appraisal toll for cross-sectional studies was used for methodological quality assessment. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) of impact on OHRQoL. For studies with dichotomous outcome, meta-analysis calculated the odds ratio (OR). Robustness, heterogeneity, certainty of evidence, and publication bias were evaluated. Confidence interval was 95%. Results: From 29 included studies, 14 assessed preschoolers, nine assessed schoolchildren, four assessed adolescents, and two assessed children/adolescents. PUFA was the main index used to assess the exposure. ECOHIS (preschoolers) and CPQ (children/adolescents) were the main tools used to assess the outcome. Only five articles fully adhered to the quality criteria. The meta-analyses found the following main results: a) preschoolers: MD -10.79 (-16.50; -5.09); b) schoolchildren: MD -5.12 (-7.51; -2.72); c) adolescents: MD -1.86 (-4.59; 0.87); d) overall impact: SMD -2.18; (CI: -3.21;-1.15) and OR 0.52 (CI: 0.30; 0.90). Conclusion: Pulp involvement impacted OHRQoL of children negatively. In adolescents, this impact was not observed. Results must be interpreted with caution due to very low certainty of evidence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?