2.5D deep learning based on multi-parameter MRI to differentiate primary lung cancer pathological subtypes in patients with brain metastases

Jinling Zhu,Li Zou,Xin Xie,Ruizhe Xu,Ye Tian,Bo Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111712
2024-08-28
Abstract:Background: Brain metastases (BMs) represents a severe neurological complication stemming from cancers originating from various sources. It is a highly challenging clinical task to accurately distinguish the pathological subtypes of brain metastatic tumors from lung cancer (LC).The utility of 2.5-dimensional (2.5D) deep learning (DL) in distinguishing pathological subtypes of LC with BMs is yet to be determined. Methods: A total of 250 patients were included in this retrospective study, divided in a 7:3 ratio into training set (N=175) and testing set (N=75). We devised a method to assemble a series of two-dimensional (2D) images by extracting adjacent slices from a central slice in both superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions to form a 2.5D dataset. Multi-Instance learning (MIL) is a weakly supervised learning method that organizes training instances into "bags" and provides labels for entire bags, with the purpose of learning a classifier based on the labeled positive and negative bags to predict the corresponding class for an unknown bag. Therefore, we employed MIL to construct a comprehensive 2.5D feature set. Then we used the single-slice as input for constructing the 2D model. DL features were extracted from these slices using the pre-trained ResNet101. All feature sets were inputted into the support vector machine (SVM) for evaluation. The diagnostic performance of the classification models were evaluated using five-fold cross-validation, with accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) metrics calculated for analysis. Results: The optimal performance was obtained using the 2.5D DL model, which achieved the micro-AUC of 0.868 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.817-0.919) and accuracy of 0.836 in the test cohort. The 2D model achieved the micro-AUC of 0.836 (95 % CI, 0.778-0.894) and accuracy of 0.827 in the test cohort. Conclusions: The proposed 2.5D DL model is feasible and effective in identifying pathological subtypes of BMs from lung cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?