Abstract:The international authorities, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization, World Organization for Animal Health, United Nations Environment Programme, and World Bank, have endorsed the One Health concept as an effective approach to optimize the health of people, animals, and the environment. The One Health concept is considered as an integrated and unifying approach with the objective of sustainably balancing and optimizing the health of people, animals, and ecosystems. Despite variations in its definitions, the underlying principle remains consistent - recognizing the interconnected and interdependent health of humans, animals, and the environment, necessitating interdisciplinary collaboration to optimize health outcomes. The One Health approach has been applied in numerous countries for detecting, managing, and controlling diseases. Moreover, the concept has found application in various areas, including antimicrobial resistance, food safety, and ecotoxicology, with a growing demand. There is a growing consensus that the One Health concept and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals mutually reinforce each other. The World Bank has recommended five domains as foundational building blocks for operationalising the One Health approach, which includes: i) One Health stakeholders, roles, and responsibilities; ii) financial and personal resources; iii) communication and information; iv) technical infrastructure; and v) governance. The domains provide a generalised overview of the One Health concept and guide to its application. We conducted a scoping review following the five-staged Arksey and O'Malley's framework. The objective of the review was to map and synthesise available evidence of application of the One Health approach to five major zoonotic diseases using the World Bank domains. Publications from the year 2004, marking the inception of the term 'One Health,' to 2022 were included. Information was charted and categorised against the World Bank domains identified as a priori. We included 1132 records obtained from three databases: Embase, Medline, and Global Health; as well as other sources. After excluding duplicates, screening for titles and abstracts, and full text screening, 20 articles that contained descriptions of 29 studies that implemented the One Health approach were selected for the review. We found that included studies varied in the extent to which the five domains were utilised. Less than half the total studies (45%) used all the five domains and none of the studies used all the sub-domains. The environmental sector showed an underrepresentation in the application of the One Health approach to zoonotic diseases as 14 (48%) studies in 10 articles did not mention it as a stakeholder. Sixty two percent of the studies mentioned receiving support from international partners in implementing the One Health approach and 76% of the studies were supported by international donors to conduct the studies. The review identified disparate funding mechanisms employed in the implementation of the One Health approach. However, there were limited discussions on plans for continuity and viability of these funding mechanisms in the future.

Ontologies related to livestock for the Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme: a review

Informatics progress of the Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme towards data for One Health

Global Burden of Animal Diseases informatics strategy, data quality and model interoperability

Current and potential use of animal disease data by stakeholders in the global south and north

A globally-applicable disease ontology for biosurveillance; Anthology of Biosurveillance Diseases (ABD)

Interpretation and utility of the Animal Health Loss Envelope as part of the Global Burden of Animal Diseases analytical process

The Vertebrate Breed Ontology: Towards Effective Breed Data Standardization

Data sharing and ontology use among agricultural genetics, genomics, and breeding databases and resources of the AgBioData Consortium

Understanding decision-makers and their needs: framing Global Burden of Animal Diseases offerings to enhance relevance and increase impact

An Ontology to Improve Transparency in Case Definition and Increase Case Finding of Infectious Intestinal Disease: Database Study in English General Practice

Evaluation Survey on Agreement with Existing Definitions of Biosecurity with a Focus on Livestock

Creation and unification of development and life stage ontologies for animals

Application of Global Burden of Animal Diseases methods at country level: experiences of the Ethiopia case study

Quantifying cost of disease in livestock: a new metric for the Global Burden of Animal Diseases

A methodological framework for attributing the burden of animal disease to specific causes

Veterinary Services'use of the Global Burden of Animal Diseases to prioritise interventions, monitor impact and develop critical competencies

How the Global Burden of Animal Diseases links to the Global Burden of Crop Loss: a food systems perspective

Special supplement issue on quality assurance and enrichment of biological and biomedical ontologies and terminologies

Context Is Everything: Harmonization of Critical Food Microbiology Descriptors and Metadata for Improved Food Safety and Surveillance

The application of the One Health approach in the management of five major zoonotic diseases using the World Bank domains: A scoping review

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA): a genetic resource for vertebrate animals