Phase III randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant paclitaxel+platinum to 5-fluorouracil+platinum in esophageal/GEJ squamous cell carcinoma

Vanita Noronha,Vijay Maruti Patil,Nandini Menon,Amit Joshi,Minit Jalan Shah,Ajaykumar Singh,Supriya Goud,Srushti Shah,Sucheta More,Kavita Nawale,Dipti Nakti,Akanksha Yadav,Shweta Jogdhankar,Rajeev Kumar,Virendra Kumar Tiwari,Devayani Niyogi,Nilendu Purandare,Amit Janu,Nivedita Chakrabarty,Abhishek Mahajan,Anil Tibdewal,Jaiprakash Agarwal,Akash Pawar,Oindrila Roy Chowdhury,Vibhor Sharma,Venkatesh Kapu,Mehak Trika,Srigadha Vivek Kumar,Manali Kolkur,Priyanka Bhagyavant,Zoya Peelay,Rutvij Khedkar,Medha Jain,Rajendra Badwe,Kumar Prabhash
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae214
2024-09-02
Abstract:Purpose: Standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for locally advanced esophageal/gastroesophageal junction squamous cancer (LAEGSC), 5-fluorouracil (5FU)+platinum, is toxic and logistically challenging; alternative regimens are needed. Patients and methods: Phase III randomized open-label non-inferiority trial at Tata Memorial Center, India, in resectable LAEGSC. Patients were randomized 1:1 to three cycles of 3-weekly platinum (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 6) with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (day 1) or 5FU 1000 mg/m2 continuous infusion (days 1-4), followed by surgery. Results: Between August 2014 and June 2022, we enrolled 420 patients; 210 to each arm. Significantly more patients on paclitaxel + platinum (194 (92.3%)] received all 3 chemotherapy cycles than on 5FU+platinum (170 [85.9%]), P = .009. 5FU + platinum caused more grade ≥ 3 toxicities (124 [69.7%]) than paclitaxel + platinum (97 [51.9%]), P = .001. Surgery was performed in 131 (62.4%) patients on 5FU + platinum vs 139 (66.2%) on paclitaxel + platinum, P = .415. Paclitaxel + platinum resulted in higher pathologic primary tumor clearance (33 [25.8%]) vs 17 [15%]; P = .04), and pathologic complete responses in 21.9% compared to 12.4% from 5FU + platinum, P = .053. Median OS was 27.5 months (95% CI, 18.6-43.5) from paclitaxel + platinum, which was non-inferior to 27.1 months (95% CI, 18.8-40.7) from 5FU + platinum; HR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.72-1.09); P = .346. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant paclitaxel + platinum chemotherapy is safer, and results in similar R0 resections, higher pathologic tumor clearance and non-inferior survival, compared to 5FU + platinum. Paclitaxel + platinum should replace 5FU + platinum as NACT for resectable LAEGSC. Clinical trials registry india number: CTRI/2014/04/004516.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?