Patient Participant Perspectives on Implementation of Long-Acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine: Results From the Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Implementation Study in European Locations (CARISEL) Study

Cassidy A Gutner,Marc van der Valk,Joaquin Portilla,Eliette Jeanmaire,Leïla Belkhir,Thomas Lutz,Rebecca DeMoor,Rekha Trehan,Jenny Scherzer,Miguel Pascual-Bernáldez,Mounir Ait-Khaled,Beatriz Hernandez,Annemiek de Ruiter,Savita Bakhshi Anand,Emma L Low,Monica Hadi,Nicola Barnes,Nick Sevdalis,Perry Mohammed,Maggie Czarnogorski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259582241269837
Abstract:Introduction: CARISEL is an implementation-effectiveness "hybrid" study examining the perspectives of people living with HIV-1 (patient study participants [PSPs]) on cabotegravir (CAB) plus rilpivirine (RPV) long-acting (LA) dosed every 2 months (Q2M) across 5 European countries. Methods: PSPs completed questionnaires on acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure), appropriateness (Intervention Appropriateness Measure), and feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure) at their first (Month [M] 1), third (M4), and seventh (M12) injection visits. Semistructured qualitative interviews were also conducted. Results: Overall, 437 PSPs were enrolled, of whom 430 received treatment. Median (interquartile range) age was 44 (37-51) years, 25.3% (n = 109/430) were female (sex at birth), and 21.9% (n = 94/430) were persons of color. Across time points, PSPs found CAB + RPV LA highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible (mean scores ≥4.47/5). Qualitative data supported these observations. Conclusions: PSPs found CAB + RPV LA Q2M to be an acceptable, appropriate, and feasible treatment option.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?