Abstract:Counting the number of young in a brood from a distance is common practice, for example in tree-nesting birds. These counts can, however, suffer from over and undercounting, which can lead to biased estimates of fecundity (average number of nestlings per brood). Statistical model development to account for observation bias has focused on false negatives (undercounts), yet it has been shown that these models are sensitive to the presence of false positives (overcounts) when they are not accounted for. Here, we develop a model that estimates fecundity while accounting for both false positives and false negatives in brood counts. Its parameters can be estimated using a calibration approach that combines uncertain counts with certain ones, which can be obtained by accessing the brood, for example during ringing. The model uses multinomial distributions to estimate the probabilities of observing y young conditional on the true state of a brood z (i.e., true number of young) from paired uncertain and certain counts. These classification probabilities are then used to estimate the true state of broods for which only uncertain counts are available. We use a simulation study to investigate bias and precision of the model and parameterize the simulation with empirical data from 26 red kite nests visited with ground and nest-based counts during 2021 and 2022 in central Europe. In these data, bias in counts was at most 1 in either direction, more common in larger broods, and undercounting was more common than overcounting. This led to an overall 5% negative bias in fecundity in uncertain counts. The model produced essentially unbiased estimates (relative bias < 2%) of fecundity across a range of sample sizes. This held true whether or not fecundity was the same for nests with paired counts and those with uncertain-only counts. But the model could not estimate parameters when true states were missing from the paired data, which happened frequently in small sample sizes (n = 10 or 25). Further, we projected populations 50 years into the future using fecundity estimates corrected for observation biases from the multinomial model, and based on 'raw' uncertain observations. We found that ignoring observation bias led to strong negative bias in projected population size for growing populations, but only minor negative bias in declining populations. Accounting for apparently minor biases associated with ground counts is important for ensuring accurate estimates of abundance and population dynamics especially for increasing populations. This could be particularly important for informing conservation decisions in projects aimed at recovering depleted populations.

Reassessment of French breeding bird population sizes using citizen science and accounting for species detectability

Improving national bird population estimates in Europe: insights from comparisons with atlas abundance data

Airborne imagery does not preclude detectability issues in estimating bird colony size

Supplemental structured surveys and pre-existing detection models improve fine-scale density and population estimation with opportunistic community science data

Capitalising on Opportunistic Data for Monitoring Species Relative Abundances

Assessing citizen science data quality for bird monitoring in the Iberian Peninsula

Assessing adequacy of citizen science datasets for biodiversity monitoring

Population monitoring and conservation implications of intra- and interspecific nest occupation rates in swallows

Improving population size estimation at western capercaillie leks: lek counts versus genetic methods

Large-bodied birds are over-represented in unstructured citizen science data

Tracking data as an alternative to resighting data for inferring population ranges

Assessing the potential of BirdNET to infer European bird communities from large-scale ecoacoustic data

Ecological markers to monitor migratory bird populations: Integrating citizen science and transboundary management for conservation purposes

Evaluating ecological uniqueness over broad spatial extents using species distribution modelling

Evaluating the predictors of habitat use and successful reproduction in a model bird species using a large‐scale automated acoustic array

LEVERAGING CITIZEN SCIENCE TO ASSESS RICHNESS, DIVERSITY, AND ABUNDANCE IN ANT COMMUNITIES

Habitat Suitability in the Eyes of the Beholder: Using Random Forest Models to Predict Land Cover Type and Scale of Selection Through Avian Functional Traits

Estimation of species relative abundances and habitat preferences using opportunistic data

Survey effort and targeted landbird community metrics at Indiana lowland forest restoration sites

Indicators of a data-deficient taxa: combining bird and environmental data enhances predictive accuracy of wild bee richness

Accounting for observation biases associated with counts of young when estimating fecundity: case study on the arboreal-nesting red kite (Milvus milvus)