Parental feeding in the dinosaur Lufengosaurus revealed through multidisciplinary comparisons with altricial and precocious birds

Robert R Reisz,Timothy D Huang,Chuan-Mu Chen,Shu-Ju Tu,Tung-Chou Tsai,ShiMing Zhong,Ethan D Mooney,Joseph J Bevitt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70981-8
2024-09-02
Abstract:Previous studies arguing for parental care in dinosaurs have been primarily based on fossil accumulations of adults and hatchlings, perinatal and post-hatchlings in nests and nest areas, and evidence of brooding, the majority of which date to the Late Cretaceous. Similarly, the general body proportions of preserved embryonic skeletons of the much older Early Jurassic Massospondylus have been used to suggest that hatchlings were unable to forage for themselves. Here, we approach the question of parental care in dinosaurs by using a combined morphological, chemical, and biomechanical approach to compare early embryonic and hatchling bones of the Early Jurassic sauropodomorph Lufengosaurus with those of extant avian taxa with known levels of parental care. We compare femora, the main weight-bearing limb bone, at various embryonic and post-embryonic stages in a precocious and an altricial extant avian dinosaur with those of embryonic and hatchling Lufengosaurus, and find that the rate and degree of bone development in Lufengosaurus is closer to that of the highly altricial Columba (pigeon) than the precocious Gallus (chicken), providing strong support for the hypothesis that Lufengosaurus was fully altricial. We suggest that the limb bones of Lufengosaurus hatchlings were not strong enough to forage for themselves and would likely need parental feeding.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?