How disrupted interoception could lead to disturbances in perceptual reality monitoring
Nadine Dijkstra Laura Convertino Sarah Garfinkel a Department of Imaging Neuroscience,Institute of Neurology,University College London,London,UKb King's College London,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,London,UK South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,London,UK Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience,University College London,London,UKc Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience,Institute of Neurology,University College London,London,UK
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2024.2422620
2024-11-09
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
Abstract:Most people can experience things that are not there: when dreaming, remembering the past or imagining the future. Contemporary theories of brain function propose that such internally generated perceptual experience relies on similar neural machinery to that engaged by externally driven perception (Bastos et al., Citation 2012 ; Friston et al., Citation 2006 ). In line with this, several lines of research have demonstrated overlapping patterns of activity in sensory cortices during imagination and perception. For example, activity in early visual cortices can be used to decode the content of dreams (Horikawa et al., Citation 2013 ; Siclari et al., Citation 2017 ); sensory patterns are reinstated in early visual regions during memory (Bosch et al., Citation 2014 ; Harrison & Tong, Citation 2009 ); and decoders trained on visual cortex activity during perception can predict what people imagine (Albers et al., Citation 2013 ; Lee et al., Citation 2012 ; Ragni et al., Citation 2020 ), especially when they imagine very vividly (Dijkstra et al., Citation 2017 ). Given this overlap in neural activation patterns, how does our brain keep apart sensory activity representing reality from that representing imagination?
psychiatry