Gender and contemporary risk of adverse events in atrial fibrillation

Asgher Champsi,Alastair R Mobley,Anuradhaa Subramanian,Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar,Xiaoxia Wang,David Shukla,Karina V Bunting,Inge Molgaard,Jeremy Dwight,Ruben Casado Arroyo,Harry J G M Crijns,Luigina Guasti,Maddalena Lettino,R Thomas Lumbers,Bart Maesen,Michiel Rienstra,Emma Svennberg,Otilia Țica,Vassil Traykov,Stylianos Tzeis,Isabelle van Gelder,Dipak Kotecha
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae539
2024-09-01
Abstract:Background and aims: The role of gender in decision-making for oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. Methods: The population cohort study used electronic healthcare records of 16 587 749 patients from UK primary care (2005-2020). Primary (composite of all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke, or arterial thromboembolism) and secondary outcomes were analysed using Cox hazard ratios (HR), adjusted for age, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. Results: 78 852 patients were included with AF, aged 40-75 years, no prior stroke, and no prescription of oral anticoagulants. 28 590 (36.3%) were women, and 50 262 (63.7%) men. Median age was 65.7 years (interquartile range 58.5-70.9), with women being older and having other differences in comorbidities. During a total follow-up of 431 086 patient-years, women had a lower adjusted primary outcome rate with HR 0.89 vs. men (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.92; P < .001) and HR 0.87 after censoring for oral anticoagulation (95% CI 0.83-0.91; P < .001). This was driven by lower mortality in women (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.83-0.89; P < .001). No difference was identified between women and men for the secondary outcomes of ischaemic stroke or arterial thromboembolism (adjusted HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.07; P = .87), any stroke or any thromboembolism (adjusted HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.07; P = .58), and incident vascular dementia (adjusted HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.97-1.32; P = .11). Clinical risk scores were only modest predictors of outcomes, with CHA2DS2-VA (ignoring gender) superior to CHA2DS2-VASc for primary outcomes in this population (receiver operating characteristic curve area 0.651 vs. 0.639; P < .001) and no interaction with gender (P = .45). Conclusions: Removal of gender from clinical risk scoring could simplify the approach to which patients with AF should be offered oral anticoagulation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?