Status of LGBTQ+ inclusion: Multi-institution Assessment of US Radiology Residencies

Jordan D Perchik,Charles Maxfield,Megan Mills,Atul Agarwal,Nate C Hull,Anne Darrow,Morlie Wang,Erin Cooke,Jayne Seekins,Mary Marx,Heidi Wassef,Jennifer Gould,Lars Grimm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.008
2024-08-29
Abstract:Introduction: An inclusive residency program is crucial to the recruitment and retention of competitive and diverse applicants. The radiology LGBTQ+ inclusion audit was published in 2022, which provided a roadmap for assessing the inclusivity of a program's policies, facilities, culture, and engagement. In this multi-institutional trial, we detail the results of the LGBTQ+ inclusion audit for nine US radiology residency programs. Methods: A volunteer cohort of academic radiology programs was recruited through the Radiology Residency Education Research Alliance. The LGBTQ+ inclusion audit was modified to apply to a multi-institutional study. Participating programs performed the audit from December 2023-February 2024. A pre- and post-audit survey were distributed to capture participants subjective assessment of inclusivity at their programs. Results: Nine US radiology residency programs completed the audit. Audit scores ranged from 6/10 to 9/10; no program received a perfect 10/10 score. Inclusive facilities and institutional culture scored highly, with 8/9 programs reporting all milestones met in these areas. The lowest performing areas were department culture and community engagement with only 3/9 and 4/9 programs reporting "all milestones met". After the audit, programs overall reported improved self-perceived inclusivity, with post-audit survey scores increasing in areas related to department policy, inclusive facilities, and LGBTQ community outreach. Discussion: Participating radiology residency programs demonstrated an overall high level of LGBTQ+ inclusivity, however all programs identified inclusion shortcomings in department policy and practice. Intentional review of a department can be a helpful tool to promote a welcoming and healthy environment for a diverse radiology practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?