Identification of a proteomic signature for predicting immunotherapy response in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Patricia Mondelo-Macía,Jorge García-González,Luis León-Mateos,Alicia Abalo,Susana Bravo,María Del Pilar Chantada Vazquez,Laura Muinelo-Romay,Rafael López-López,Roberto Díaz-Peña,Ana B Dávila-Ibáñez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100834
2024-08-29
Abstract:Background: Immunotherapy has improved survival rates in cancer patients, but identifying those who will respond to treatment remains a challenge. Recent advances in proteomic technologies have enabled the identification and quantification of nearly all expressed proteins in a single experiment. Integration of mass spectrometry with other high-throughput technologies has paved the way for comprehensive and systematic analysis of the plasma proteome in cancer, facilitating early diagnosis and personalized treatment. In this context, the objective of our study was to investigate the predictive and prognostic value of plasma proteome analysis using the SWATH-MS (Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra) strategy in newly diagnosed NSCLC patients who received pembrolizumab therapy. Methods: For this purpose, 64 newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab therapy were enrolled and blood samples were collected from all patients before and during therapy. In total 171 blood samples were collected, and plasma samples were analysed employing SWATH-MS strategy. Next, we compared the plasma protein expression of metastatic NSCLC patients prior to receiving pembrolizumab treatment and divided the cohort into two groups in order to identify a proteomic signature that allow us to predict immunotherapy response. Results: Proteomic analyses by SWATH-MS strategy allow us to identified 324 differentially expressed proteins between responder and non-responder patients. In addition, we developed a predictive model and found a combination of seven proteins, including ATG9A, DCDC2, HPS5, FIL1L, LZTL1, PGTA, and SPTN2, with stronger predictive value than PD-L1 expression alone. Additionally, survival analyses showed that low levels of ATG9A, DCDC2, and HPS5 were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while low levels of SPTN2 were associated with worse OS. Conclusions: Our work highlights the potential value of proteomic technologies to detect predictive biomarkers in blood samples of NSCLC patients. These analyses shed light on the correlation between the response to immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC and the set of 7 proteins.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?