Cardiovascular risk and glucocorticoids: a Dutch National Registry of growth hormone treatment in adults with growth hormone deficiency analysis

Tessa N A Slagboom,Christa C van Bunderen,Aart Jan van der Lely,Madeleine L Drent
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-024-01448-2
2024-08-31
Pituitary
Abstract:Purpose: Patients with hypopituitarism are at increased cardiovascular risk, in part because of growth hormone deficiency (GHD), but probably also because of the overuse of glucocorticosteroids in concomitant adrenal insufficiency (AI). We hypothesized that patients with hypopituitarism that were on glucocorticosteroid replacement therapy for concomitant AI would have worse cardiovascular outcomes than those without. Methods: Retrospective nationwide cohort study. GHD patients from the Dutch National Registry of Growth Hormone Treatment in adults were grouped by the presence (AI; N = 1836) or absence (non-AI; N = 750) of concomitant AI, and differences between groups were analyzed for baseline characteristics and cardiovascular risk, at baseline and during GHRT. Results: At baseline, AI patients had higher levels of total and LDL cholesterol (both p < 0.01). During GHRT, AI patients were more likely to use cardiovascular drugs (p ≤ 0.01), but we did not find worse outcomes for blood pressure, body composition, lipid and glucose metabolism. The risk of developing peripheral arterial disease (HR 2.22 [1.06-4.65]) and non-fatal cerebrovascular events (HR 3.47 [1.60-7.52]) was higher in AI patients, but these differences disappeared in the models adjusted for baseline differences. Conclusion: We found no clear evidence to support our hypothesis that patients with hypopituitarism and concomitant AI have worse cardiovascular outcomes than non-AI patients. This suggests that glucocorticoid replacement therapy in AI may be safer than previously thought. However, cardiovascular burden, events and medication use at baseline and during GHRT (in unadjusted models) were higher in AI; so the lack of power, the important role of (adjusting for) other risk factors, and the inability to distinguish between glucocorticoid treatment regimens may have influenced the outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?