Curriculum evaluation in medical and health‐care education

C. Coles,Janet F Grant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1985.tb01345.x

1985-09-01

Medical Education

Abstract:This booklet is the first in a series to appear under the auspices of the Association for the Study of Medical Education Research Comniittee. The intention of these small publications is to introduce teachers and researchers in medical education to current ideas about, and approaches to, curriculum evaluation and educational research. This first booklet ‘sets the scene’, as it were, for the series as a whole by addressing broad questions about the nature of curriculum evaluation. Future booklets in the series will focus more particularly on the practicalities and methods involved in planning, implementing and acting upon the findings which emerge from an evaluation. In this booklet, we want to introduce a general model of curriculum evaluation as a basis for the various points we wish to make here. In addition it will also underpin future booklets in the series which will refer to it again. For this reason this booklet is somewhat lengthier than those that follow and takes a broader view. The model of curriculum evaluation proposed is shown in Fig. I . At one level this diagram shows that development of an educational event can occur without any substantial commitment to evaluaCorrespondence: Dr Colin K. Coles, Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton University, General Hospital, Southampton SO9 4XY, England. tion. However, it is suggested that to this somewhat simplistic view must be added a ‘feedback loop’. Thus, curriculum evaluation is a deliberate act of enquiry which sets out with the intention of allowing people concerned with an educational event to make rigorous, informed judgements and decisions about it, so that appropriate development may be facilitated. The boxes or ‘units’ in the model represent a collection or series of actions from planning, through data collection and analysis, to disseminating findings and decision-making, and finally implementing change and effecting educational development. Each ‘unit’ in the model requires some attention if a coherent and effective process of evaluation and educational improvement is to be achieved. The booklet highlights the significant issues and actions associated with this model and indicates the practical relationships between the various units as well as the conceptual framework for evaluation which the overall diagram represents. Subsequent booklets in the series will take up specific aspects of evaluation in a more detailed and practical manner. Titles currently planned include the following topics: