Evaluation of prognostic factors for high-risk classical Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing autologous transplantation

Narendranath Epperla,Ying Huang,Amanda F Cashen,John L Vaughn,Walter Hanel,Talha Badar,Stefan K Barta,Paolo F Caimi,Tarsheen K Sethi,Nishitha Reddy,Reem Karmali,Celeste Bello,Julio C Chavez,Shalin K Kothari,Francisco J Hernandez-Ilizaliturri,Jakub Svoboda,Frederick Lansigan,Martha J Glenn,Jonathon B Cohen,Caryn Sorge,Beth Christian,Alex F Herrera,Mehdi Hamadani,Luciano J Costa,Ana C Xavier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013743
2024-08-30
Abstract:There are limited data assessing the risk scores for primary treatment failure (PTF) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL, PTF-cHL) undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). ECLIPSE is a multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with PTF- cHL (15 years or older) diagnosed on or after Jan 1, 2005, at 15 US medical centers. PTF was defined as one of the following patterns of failure: [1] progressive disease by imaging during or within 6 weeks of completion of frontline chemotherapy (primary progression [PP]); [2] partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) by imaging after completion of frontline treatment (PR/SD); [3] progression of disease by imaging (and confirmed by biopsy) within 12 months of frontline therapy completion after prior documentation of complete response (CR, early relapse [ER]). A total of 478 patients were included in the analysis. Among these, 217 (45%) were PP, 86 (18%) were PR/SD, and 175 (37%) were ER. The 6-month and 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality following auto-HCT was 0.9% and 1.1%, respectively. The median PFS and OS following auto-HCT were 4.33 years and 10.09 years, respectively. While those not in CR at the time of auto-HCT was associated with inferior PFS and OS, advanced age and those diagnosed before 2011 were associated with inferior OS. This study showcases the safety and long-term efficacy of auto-HCT, even in patients with high risk disease who are traditionally considered chemo-refractory and will serve as a benchmark for the ongoing transplant vs no transplant trials.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?