Abstract:Background: Firearm injuries cause significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with firearm injuries require urgent/emergency operative procedures but the literature incompletely describes how anesthesia care and outcomes differ between high acuity trauma patients with and without firearm injuries. Our objective was to examine anesthesia care, resource utilization, and outcomes of patients with acute firearm injuries compared to nonfirearm injuries. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients ≥18 years admitted to a regional Level 1 trauma center between 2014 and 2022 who required operative management within the first 2 hours of hospital arrival. We examined clinical characteristics, anesthesiology care practices, and intra- and postoperative outcomes of patients with firearm injuries compared to patients with nonfirearm injuries. Results: Over the 9-year study period, firearm injuries accounted for the largest yearly average increase in trauma admissions (firearm 10.1%, blunt 3.2%, other 1.3%, motor-vehicle crash 0.9%). Emergency anesthesiology care within 2 hours of arrival was delivered to 4.7% of injured patients (2124; 541 firearm [25.4%] and 1583 [74.5%] nonfirearm). Patients with firearm injuries were younger (30 [23-40] years vs 41 [29-56] years; P < .0001), male (90% vs 75%; P < .0001), direct admissions from scene (78% vs 62%; P < .0001), had less polytrauma (10% vs 22%; P < .0001), arrived after hours (73% vs 63%; P < .0001), and received earlier anesthesiology care (0.4 [0.3-0.7] vs 0.9 [0.5-1.5] hours after arrival; P < .0001). Patients with firearm injuries more often received invasive arterial (83% vs 77%; P < .0001) and central venous (14% vs 10%; P = .02) cannulation, blood products (3 [0-11] vs 0 [0-7] units; P < .0001), tranexamic acid (30% vs 22%; P < .001), as well as had higher estimated blood loss (500 [200-1588] mL vs 300 [100-1000] mL; P < .0001), and were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) more frequently (83% vs 77%; P < .001) than patients with nonfirearm injuries. Intraoperative mortality was comparable (6% firearm vs 4% nonfirearm) but postoperative mortality was lower for patients with firearm injuries who survived the intraoperative course (6% vs 14%; P < .0001). Comparatively, more patients with firearm injuries were discharged to home, or to jail (P < .001). Conclusions: Over the study period, anesthesiologists increasingly cared for patients with firearm injuries, who often present outside of daytime hours and require urgent operative intervention. Operating room readiness and high-intensity resuscitation capacity, such as access to hemostatic control measures, are critical to achieving intraoperative survival and favorable postoperative outcomes, particularly for patients with firearm injuries.

Exploratory qualitative study of firearm storage practices among surgeons in the USA: contexts and motivations

Correlates of dangerous firearm storage among a representative sample of firearm owners across nine states

Survey of Firearm Storage Practices and Preferences Among Parents and Caregivers of Children

Gun Ownership for Safety/Protection and Unsecured Firearm Storage Practices: Suicide Risk and Prevention Among U.S. Army Servicemembers

Firearm storage practices among military veterans in the United States: Findings from a nationally representative survey

Psychosocial well-being and firearm storage practices: evidence from five US states

Locked and loaded: correlates of in-home firearm storage beliefs and behaviours

Threat perceptions, defensive behaviors, and the perceived suicide prevention value of specific firearm storage practices

Examining whether method of suicide exposure and closeness to decedent relate to firearm storage practices

A Study of Households with Children and Firearms in Baltimore, Maryland

Firearm locking device preferences among firearm owners in the USA: a systematic review

Regional differences in firearm ownership, storage and use: results from a representative survey of five US states

Preinjury and Event-Related Characteristics of Pediatric Firearm Injuries: The American College of Surgeons Firearm Study, United States, March 2021‒February 2022

Associations Between PTSD Features and Firearm Ownership and Storage: Results From the PRImary Care Screening Methods (PRISM) Study

Storage of firearms in vehicles: findings from a sample of firearm owners in nine U.S. states

Internists' and Surgeons' Attitudes toward Guns and Firearm Injury Prevention

Emergency Anesthesiology Encounters, Care Practices, and Outcomes for Patients with Firearm Injuries: A 9-Year Single-Center US Level 1 Trauma Experience

Receptivity of providing firearm safety storage devices to parents along with firearms safety education

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of an Education Program for Primary Care Teams on Discussing Firearms Storage Safety with Veterans

Firearm screening and secure storage counseling among home visiting providers: a cross-sectional study of SafeCare® providers in the U.S.

Whether and how to store firearms in the home: Qualitative insights from care partner experiences in the Safety in Dementia Trial