Machine Learning Algorithms for Neurosurgical Preoperative Planning: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of the Literature
Jhon E. Bocanegra-Becerra,Julia Sader Neves Ferreira,Gabriel Simoni,Anthony Hong,Wagner Rios-Garcia,Mohammad Mirahmadi Eraghi,Adriam M. Castilla-Encinas,Jhair Alejandro Colan,Rolando Rojas-Apaza,Emanuel Eduardo Franco Pariasca Trevejo,Raphael Bertani,Miguel Angel Lopez-Gonzalez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.04.24314930
2024-10-07
Abstract:Introduction
Preoperative neurosurgical planning is a keen step to avoiding surgical complications, reducing morbidity, and improving patient safety. The incursion of machine learning (ML) in this domain has recently gained attention, given the notable advantages in processing large data sets and potentially generating efficient and accurate algorithms in patient care.
Objective
To evaluate the evolving applications of ML algorithms in the preoperative planning of brain and spine surgery.
Methods
In accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted using three databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science). Articles that described the use of ML for preoperative planning in brain and spine surgery were included. Relevant data were collected regarding the neurosurgical field of application, patient baseline features, disease description, type of ML technology, study's aim, preoperative ML algorithm description, and advantages and limitations of ML algorithms.
Results
Our search strategy yielded 7,407 articles, of which 8 studies (5 retrospective, 2 prospective, and 1 experimental study) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Clinical information from 518 patients (62.7% female; mean age: 44.8 years) was used for generating ML algorithms, including convolutional neural network (14.3%), logistic regression (14.3%), random forest (14.3%), and other algorithms (Table 1). Neurosurgical fields of applications included functional neurosurgery (37.5%), tumor surgery (37.5%), and spine surgery (25%). The main advantages of ML included automated processing of clinical and imaging information, selection of an individualized patient surgical approach and data-driven support for treatment decision-making. All studies reported technical limitations, such as long processing time, algorithmic bias, limited generalizability, and the need for database updating and maintenance.
Conclusion
ML algorithms for preoperative neurosurgical planning are being developed for efficient, automated, and safe treatment decision-making. Enhancing the robustness, transparency, and understanding of ML applications will be crucial for their successful integration into neurosurgical practice.
Surgery