Daily vs Alternate Day Iron Supplementation for Pregnant Women With Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Melissa Chu Lam,Binny Khandakar Khandakar,Isaak Heon,Farrah Hussain,Kristina Martimucci,Elianna Kaplowitz,Jessica Overbey,Lois Brustman,Barak Rosenn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2405-1381
2024-08-29
Abstract:Objective: Evaluate the most effective regimen to raise hemoglobin by comparing alternate day dosing of iron to daily dosing in pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia. Study design: Women with Hb <11.0 g/dl and ferritin  25 ug/L between 12w0d-34w0d gestation were recruited. 88 patients were randomized using block randomization with 1:1 allocation to receive either 1 tablet of 325mg ferrous sulfate on consecutive days or 2 tablets every other day. The primary outcome, the change in hemoglobin after 6 weeks of treatment was assessed using an analysis of covariance to adjust for baseline level. Secondary outcomes included change in ferritin, hepcidin, side effects, and compliance. Patients completed a questionnaire to assess for adverse symptoms and adherence was monitored by installing a pill reminder app on smartphones of patients. Results: 88 patients were consented. The daily iron group had a greater proportion of nulliparous women (40% vs 7%). Most patients (98%) had mild anemia (Hb 9-10.9 g/dl) at recruitment, with a median gestational age of 28.1 weeks (IQR: 25.6,30.9) and median duration of treatment of 42 days (IQR: 35,45). At 6 weeks, the daily iron group had a mean increase in Hb of 0.8±0.9 g/dL, while the alternate day iron group had a mean increase of 0.5±1.0 g/dL (baseline adjusted difference of means: -0.3 (95% CI: -0.7,0.1), p =0.15). Frequency of adverse effects attributable to iron were similar between groups. Patient self-reported compliance to treatment was also similar between groups. Among those that used the app, compliance was higher among the daily group compared to the alternate daily group (median 95.5% (IQR 75,100) vs 85% (IQR 40, 92)), though this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.07). Conclusions: This trial suggests that there are no significant differences between alternate day iron supplementation and daily iron supplementation for treating iron deficiency anemia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?