Association of large joint involvement at the start of biological disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs and Janus kinase inhibitors with disease activity and drug retention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: The ANSWER cohort study
Iku Shirasugi,Akira Onishi,Keisuke Nishimura,Wataru Yamamoto,Kosaku Murakami,Hideo Onizawa,Yuichi Maeda,Kosuke Ebina,Yonsu Son,Hideki Amuro,Masaki Katayama,Ryota Hara,Koji Nagai,Yuri Hiramatsu,Motomu Hashimoto,Tadashi Okano,Toshihisa Maeda,Shinya Hayashi,Sho Sendo,Sadao Jinno,Yuzuru Yamamoto,Hirotaka Yamada,Yo Ueda,Jun Saegusa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.15097
2024-03-06
International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases
Abstract:Abstract Aim To investigate the association of large joint involvement (LJI) with disease activity and drug retention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who started receiving a biological disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug or Janus kinase inhibitor. Methods Patients with RA from a Japanese multicenter observational registry were enrolled. Our definition of large joints included the shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, and ankle joints. Linear mixed‐effects models were used to examine changes in the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) score at Week 24 as the primary outcome, and drug retention rates were compared between patients with and without LJI using Cox proportional hazards models. We examined the potential effect modifications of changes in the CDAI by baseline characteristics. Results Overall, 2507 treatment courses from 1721 patients were included (LJI, 1744; no LJI, 763). Although LJI was associated with significantly higher changes in CDAI from baseline at Week 24 (difference in change in CDAI: −5.84 [−6.65 to −5.03], p < .001), CDAI was significantly higher in patients with LJI over time. Retention rates were similar in both groups. The association of LJI with changes in disease activity was more prominent in patients with a short disease duration, negative anti‐citrullinated peptide antibodies, and interleukin‐6 receptor inhibitor (IL‐6Ri) use. Conclusion Although LJI was associated with a greater reduction in disease activity from baseline, higher disease activity at baseline was not offset over time in patients with LJI, demonstrating that LJI is an unfavorable predictor. An early treat‐to‐target strategy using an IL‐6Ri may be beneficial for patients with LJI.
rheumatology