The adipofascial flap based on an ulnar artery perforator: an alternative option for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome

S. Noor,V. Rajaratnam,R. Jose
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193412439827
2012-03-01
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Abstract:In cases of recalcitrant carpal tunnel syndrome, many surgical procedures have been described to provide a healthy tissue bed to the median nerve, including hypothenar fat pad flaps (Strickland et al., 1996), reverse radial artery adipofascial flaps (Braun et al., 1995), pronator quadratus muscle flaps (Dautel and Merle, 1993) and abductor digiti minimi flaps (Reismann and Dellon, 1983). We report a case of the successful treatment of recalcitrant carpal tunnel syndrome by an adipofascial flap based on an ulnar artery perforator, when the intended radial artery perforator was unavailable. A 55-year old right-hand dominant woman presented with carpal tunnel syndrome in the right hand with an associated palmar wrist ganglion. Nerve conduction studies confirmed median nerve compression at the carpal tunnel on the right side. She underwent an open carpal tunnel decompression and excision of the ganglion. She then developed similar symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome on the left hand that was treated by open decompression a few months later. After successful resolution of her symptoms, she was discharged at the 3-month followup. She re-presented 6 months later with recurrence of left sided carpal tunnel syndrome and an extremely hypersensitive scar .She underwent a further decompression along with an adipofascial forearm flap based on a radial artery perforator, preserving the radial artery (Braun et al., 1995). The patient had complete resolution of symptoms on the left side, but she complained of a persistent tender scar and recurrence of median nerve symptoms on the right side. It was planned to carry out a similar adipofascial flap based © The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav doi: 10.1177/1753193412439273 available online at http://jhs.sagepub.com on a radial perforator. However, at operation it was discovered that the distal perforator on the radial side was absent as a result of the previous ganglion excision on this side. The flap was then based on a distal perforator of the ulnar artery, leaving the ulnar artery patent. Twelve months after operation, the patient was entirely pain free on both sides, with no scar tenderness and no recurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms. The patient we describe has had successful adipofascial flaps based on perforators from both the radial artery and the ulnar artery. The adipofascial flap based on the ulnar artery perforator has not been previously described for the treatment of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome and is an alternative option for median nerve coverage in circumstances when a radial-based flap is unavailable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?