Le transit baryté en double contraste dans le diagnostic des ulcérations gastriques

M. Bigard,D. Régent,B. Plouvier,J. Roussel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02973568

1974-07-01

Acta Endoscopica

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jiang Yang,Yong He,Xiaoyi Zhang,Zhi Wang,Xiaohu Zuo,Likun Gao,Li Hong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4347

IF: 3.616

2021-03-01

Annals of Translational Medicine

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Sacrocolpopexy is the gold standard procedure for treating pelvic organ prolapse (POP) patients with apical defects. Different surgical approaches have emerged and been utilized successively, including traditional laparoscopy, single-hole laparoscopy, robotic laparoscopy, vaginal-assisted laparoscopy, and transvaginal approaches. Robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) has attracted increasing attention as an emerging surgical technique and has unique advantages, such as a "simulated wrist" mechanical arm and high-definition three-dimensional (3D) visual field, which has gradually begun to be utilized in the clinical setting.METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting checklist, and a systematic literature search was conducted on six databases from their inception to 1st March 2020. We evaluated patients with POP who underwent RSC or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC), outcomes (including perioperative outcomes: blood loss, operating times, blood transfusion, and hospital stay), surgery-related complications, as well as cure and recurrence rates.RESULTS: A total of 49 articles were available, including 3,014 patients, among which 18 were comparative studies on LSC <i>vs.</i> RSC, and 31 were non-comparative single-arm studies on RSC. For RSC, median operative time was 226 [90-604] minutes, estimated blood loss was 56 [5-1,500] mL, and hospital stay was 1.55 [1-16] days. Intraoperative complications and postoperative complications occurred in 74 (2.7%) and 360 (13.0%) patients, respectively. Of 2,768 RSC patients, 40 had been converted from a robot-assisted approach to other approaches, and 134 of 1,852 patients (7.2%) have recurrent prolapses of any compartment. Compared to LSC, RSC was associated with significantly lower blood loss and lower conversion rate. However, more operative time was observed in RSC. No significant differences were observed in perioperative transfusion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, or objective recurrence between RSC and LSC.CONCLUSIONS: RSC's application seems to contribute some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both approaches appear to promote equivalent clinical outcomes. Notably, heterogeneity among studies might have affected the outcome of the study. Consequently, high-quality and large-sample randomized trials comparing both techniques are necessitated.

oncology,medicine, research & experimental
Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study

Henry H. Chill,Alireza Hadizadeh,Claudia Paya-Ten,Angela Leffelman,Cecilia Chang,Nani P. Moss,Roger P. Goldberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03011-4

2024-03-15

BMC Women s Health

Abstract:Pelvic organ prolapse is a debilitating condition impacting lives of millions of women worldwide. Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is considered an effective and durable surgical technique for treatment of apical prolapse. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes including postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters between patients who underwent SCP with a mini-laparotomy approach compared to patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic SCP.

public, environmental & occupational health,obstetrics & gynecology
Advantages of robotic surgery in the treatment of complex pelvic organs prolapse

Gabriele Naldini,Bernardina Fabiani,Alessandro Sturiale,Eleonora Russo,Tommaso Simoncini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00913-4

Abstract:Robot-assisted surgery is safe and effective to treat the complex pelvic organs prolapse (C-POP). The present study analyzes all the robotic procedures and their advantages in the treatment of C-POP performed in a Proctologic and Pelvic Floor Clinical Centre. All the patients affected by C-POP who had robot-assisted surgery were retrospective analyzed. The anatomical and functional outcomes were respectively evaluated through POP-Q grading system and Wexner score about constipation and incontinence. The satisfaction rate was investigated using a five-point scale. From September 2014 to December 2018, 229 women underwent robotic surgery. The follow-up was 12 months. There were no robot-related complications. One hematoma (4.5%) of the recto-vaginal space occurred after Robotic Ventral Rectopexy with Folded Mesh (R-VRP-FM). In the robotic assisted lateral suspension (R-ALS) group there was one case of anterior vaginal wall mesh exposure (0.9%). After the robotic ventral rectopexy (R-VRP) the recurrence rate of external rectal prolapse, internal rectal prolapse, rectocele and enterocele was respectively 6.6, 9.5, 7.4 and 9.5%. After R-VRP-FM only one cystocele (14%) and one partial rectal prolapse (25%) recurred. Vaginal bulge symptoms resolution rate was 95.4%. The mean Wexner constipation score significantly decreased after R-VRP and R-VRP-FM. Vaginal bulge symptoms improved in 98.3% of cases with any apical prolapse recurrence after robotic abdominal colposacropexy. Success rate after R-ALS was 99.1% and 96.4% for apical and anterior prolapse respectively. Robotic assistance makes some surgical steps easier and more precise and this may result in less morbidity and better results.
Transvaginal Single-Port Laparoscopy Sacrocolpopexy

Yisong Chen,Junwei Li,Ying Zhang,Keqin Hua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.017

IF: 4.314

2018-01-01

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Abstract:Study Objective: More and more patients are pursuing minimally invasive surgery, which is becoming the trend for gynecologic surgery today. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is no exception. With the application of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, minimally invasive transvaginal sacrocolpopexy surgery assisted by single-port laparoendoscopy for POP becomes feasible. Here we describe our technique of transvaginal sacrocolpopexy using single-port laparoscopy for middle compartment POP. Design: Step-by-step explanation of the procedure using video. Setting: University hospital. Patient: A 59-year-old woman from China. Interventions: Transvaginal single-port laparoscopy sacrocolpopexy. Measurements and Main Results: We performed transvaginal single-port laparoscopy sacrocolpopexy on a 59-year-old woman from China who was diagnosed with POP-Q stage II anterior compartment, stage III middle compartment, stage II posterior compartment. This patient complained of a vaginal mass that had been prolapsed for 3 months. Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee approval was obtained. Vaginal hysterectomy was performed first. Preventative bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was done after a single-port platform was established. Right pelvic peritoneum was incised, from the promontory to the vault. Then, we exposed the rectovaginal and vesicovaginal spaces after injection of a water cushion (normal saline, 0.9% Nacl). AY-shaped mesh (ARTISYN; Johnson & Johnson international, c/o European Logistics Centre, Diegem, Belgium) was fixed to the posterior vaginal wall and then to the sacral promontory (S1). After closing the pelvic peritoneum the anterior mesh was sutured. Before finishing the surgery we closed the vaginal cuff. The operation last for about 2 hours, with a blood loss of 50 mL. The patient was discharged with complete recovery. A 5-month follow-up showed no prolapse, mesh erosion, or other complications. Conclusion: Transvaginal single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a considerable choice for middle compartment POP. However, more cases should be enrolled, and additional studies are required. (C) 2017 AAGL. All rights reserved.
Effectiveness of laparoscopic pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

Yingying Yang,Zhen Li,Keyi Si,Qingqiang Dai,Yingying Qiao,Dazhuang Li,Li Zhang,Fan Wu,Jia He,Guizhu Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2023.06.011

IF: 4.314

2023-06-26

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Abstract:Study Objective To evaluate the clinical benefits of laparoscopic pectopexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Design Prospective cohort study. Setting A tertiary hospital. Patients We included 203 patients with POP. Interventions Laparoscopic pectopexy or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Measurements and main results Anatomical effectiveness was measured using the POP-quantification (POP-Q) system, both pre- and post-operation. Functional recovery effectiveness was evaluated using complications and recurrence rates within one year. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaires at enrollment and postoperative months 3, 6, and 12. Comparisons between groups were performed using t- test, Chi-square test, and mixed-effects model with repeated measures. The analysis included 203 eligible patients (sacrocolpopexy 101; pectopexy 102). The proportion of robotic-assisted surgeries was lower in the pectopexy group than in the sacrocolpopexy group (15.7% vs. 41.6%, p <0.001). The average operation time of pectopexy was shorter than that of sacrocolpopexy (174.2 vs. 187.7 mins) with a mean difference of 13.5 min (95%CI, 3.9-23.0; p =0.006). Differences of intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay and postoperative 7-day complications between groups were not significant. Anatomical successes were obtained in both groups with similar improvement in POP-Q scores. The rate of urinary symptoms recurrence was higher in the pectopexy group (13.7%) than in the sacrocolpexy group (5.0%) at the one-year follow-up (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-8.8, p =0.032). The PFDI-20 and I-QOL scores were better improved at postoperative months 3, 6 and 12 for laparoscopic pectopexy than for sacrocolpopexy. Conclusion Laparoscopic pectopexy revealed comparable anatomical success, shorter operation time, and better improvement in QOL scores of prolapse, colorectal-anal and urinary symptoms at 1-year follow-up, possibly being an alternative when sacrocolpopexy is not practicable. However, clinicians should pay more attention to the recurrence of urinary symptoms after pectopexy.

obstetrics & gynecology
Reviewer ' s report Title : High prevalence of myofascial trigger points in patients with shoulder pain

P. Dorsher

Abstract:Results subsection. I think the wording of the last sentence in the results section, though perhaps technically accurate English wording, could be misleading to the casual reader who might not read the article in depth. I think the authors should either term the correlation of number of muscles with active trigger points to DASH score as a “low-moderate” correlation, or preferably explicitly mention that the correlation found suggests the number of muscles in the shoulder girdle with active trigger points only explained about 10% of the patients’ shoulder pain symptoms as measured by the DASH score. This would provide the reader a more accurate and balanced interpretation of the data from the outset. The first and second paragraphs of the Introduction that follows imply, correctly or not, that myofascial trigger points may be an important pathophysiologic cause of chronic non-specific shoulder pain, but this study’s data (which admittedly did not look at total number of trigger points in each muscle or their sensitivity) does not show presence of active trigger points to be any more predictive than depression score in terms of the patients’ DASH scores. Further, the authors’ implication in their response that the number of trigger points in these muscles or their severity/sensitivity might better predict shoulder pain DASH scores does not seem to be corroborated by their data as Table 4 suggests finding active trigger points in the muscles studied only accounted for at most 11% of the VAS-P scores’ variance. Hopefully their other data in BMC Medicine will elucidate this.
Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes

Tommaso Simoncini,Eleonora Russo,Paolo Mannella,Andrea Giannini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4924-8

2016-06-10

Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract:BackgroundAbdominal sacral hystero-cervicopexy (ASC) is the gold standard for the treatment of apical prolapse, but requires advanced laparoscopic skills and exposes to potentially life-threatening complications. Lateral apical suspension to the abdominal wall with mesh is a feasible alternative of ASC where robotic assistance may offer specific advantages. We here describe the surgical technique and the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted lateral apical suspension (R-ALS) with the use of a titan-covered T-shaped mesh.MethodsForty consecutive patients with stage III or IV symptomatic anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse underwent R-ALS between September 2014 and September 2015.ResultsR-ALS was completed without complications in all cases with a mean operative time of 117 ± 26 min. From a technical standpoint, robotic assistance allowed for an extremely reproducible technique, with a swift learning curve and consistent length of the surgical steps. The procedure was extremely well tolerated and resulted in complete resolution of POP-associated symptoms and in improvements of POP- and incontinence-related quality-of-life scores (PQOL and IIQ7) at 1 month from surgery.ConclusionsR-ALS is feasible, safe, well-tolerated and effective at a short-term follow-up. R-ALS may represent an effective and simple alternative to abdominal sacral hystero-cervicopexy for the treatment of high-grade apical and anterior POP, avoiding the challenges of sacral mesh fixation. Robotic assistance helps achieving optimally tailored anatomic reconstruction, allowing seamless deep pelvic dissection and suturing.
Transvaginal Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Li Junwei,Sima Yizhen,Hu Changdong,Wang Xiaojuan,Lu Zhiying,Hua Keqin,Chen Yisong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01535-w

2022-01-01

BMC Surgery

Abstract:Abstract Background Sacrocolpopexy is the gold standard treatment for apical prolapse. With the development of minimally invasive surgical techniques, the new approach of transvaginal single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (TS-LSC) has become available. However, its therapeutic effects remain unclear. The aim of this study is to compare the middle-term clinical outcomes of transvaginal single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) for apical prolapse. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Patients with advanced apical prolapse who underwent either TS-LSC or LSC between May 2017 to June 2019 were enrolled. Baseline demographics, perioperative results, perioperative and postoperative complications, pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) scores, pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI-20) score and pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual function questionnaire (PISQ-12) score were collected at 2 years. Results 89 subjects were analyzed: 46 in TS-LSC and 43 in LSC group. Follow-up time was 38.67 ± 7.46 vs 41.81 ± 7.13 months, respectively. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were similar except that pain score was lower (2.37 ± 0.90 vs 3.74 ± 1.05) and cosmetic score was higher (9.02 ± 0.75 vs 7.21 ± 0.89) in TS-LSC group (P < 0.05). Complication rates did not differ between groups. 3 mesh exposure in each group were noted. Recurrence rate was 2.17% in TS-LSC and 6.98% in LSC, no apical recurrence occurred. Constipation was the most common postoperative symptom. Besides, patients in TS-LSC group had better POP-Q C point (− 6.83 ± 0.54 vs − 6.39 ± 0.62, P < 0.05), and similar Aa, Ap and TVL values. Bladder and pelvic symptoms were improved in both groups, but colorectal symptoms were not relieved. There were no differences of PISQ-12 scores between groups. Conclusion TS-LSC was not inferior to LSC at 2 years. Patients may benefit from its mild pain, better cosmetic effect and better apical support as well as good safety and efficacy. TS-LSC is a promising considerable choice for advanced vaginal apical prolapse. Trial registration ChiCTR2000032334, 2020-4-26 (retrospectively registered)
Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy

Sumin Oh,Johnny Yi,A-Young Song,Junghyun Jee,Nayoung Bae,Jung-Ho Shin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05796-2

Abstract:Introduction and hypothesis: The objective was to assess intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, along with perioperative and surgical outcomes, following single-port robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Methods: This retrospective case series included 200 patients who underwent single-port robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy to treat Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) stage 2-4 symptomatic prolapse between April 2020 and August 2023 by a single surgeon. Intraoperative and postoperative complications and perioperative outcomes were evaluated for all the patients, whereas surgical outcomes for 74 patients were assessed at 1-year follow-up. Surgical failure was defined as the presence of any of the following: the presence of vaginal bulging symptoms, any prolapse beyond the hymen, or retreatment for prolapse. Results: During the study period, 200 single-port robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexies were performed. The median age and body mass index were 65.0 years and 24.6 kg/m2 respectively. Most patients had POPQ stage 3 or 4 prolapse and underwent concomitant total hysterectomy. The median total operation time was 212.0 min, and none of the patients required conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy. The intraoperative cystotomy rate was 2.5%, and one patient had a blood transfusion owing to presacral vessel injury. Postoperative complications of mesh exposure and wound hernia were 0.5% and 2.0% respectively. At 1 year postoperatively, the rate of composite surgical failure was 9.5%, with a 5.4% anatomical recurrence rate. None of the patients experienced apical prolapse recurrence, and one received anterior colporrhaphy for anterior compartment prolapse recurrence. Conclusions: Single-port robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy is safe and effective, with low complication rates and favorable perioperative and surgical outcomes.
Improvement in Quality of Life after Laparoscopic or Robotic-assisted Sacrocolpopexy with a Single Anterior Mesh in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Institution

Riyo Kinouchi,Kanako Yoshida,Takako Kawakita,Toshiyuki Yasui,Takeshi Iwasa,Takeshi Kato

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_19_23

2024-07-18

Abstract:Objectives: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a significant health-care problem for older women. We have treated POP surgically using laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) or robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC). The original LSC and RSC procedures were done with anterior and posterior meshes; however, the use of the single mesh procedure is increasing because of its simplicity and safety. There have been few reports about the change in quality of life (QOL) using the single mesh procedure. Therefore, the present study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the change in QOL by LSC and RSC using a single anterior mesh for women without posterior compartment prolapse. Materials and methods: We performed LSC or RSC using a single anterior mesh in 52 patients who had POP without posterior vaginal wall prolapse between August 2018 and October 2022. We assessed the QOL before and after surgery using prolapse-QOL (P-QOL) questionnaires. Results: All patients who received LSC or RSC with a single anterior mesh left the hospital as scheduled without severe perioperative complications. There were no instances of wound infection or vaginal mesh extrusion. The recovery rate of questionnaires was 63.5% (33/52). All QOL score domains improved significantly, and there were no questionnaire parameters that worsened. Conclusion: LSC or RSC using only a single anterior mesh improves P-QOL with a low incidence of surgical complications for POP patients who did not have posterior vaginal wall prolapse. LSC or RSC with a single anterior mesh may be a prospective new procedure for POP.
A New Combined Laparoscopic-Vaginal Lateral Suspension Procedure for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

G M Miele,P M Marra,K Cefalì,R Venturella,C Di Carlo,F Zullo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.010

IF: 2.633

Urology

Abstract:Objective: To show an original technique of a new combined vaginal-laparoscopic lateral suspension in Hysteropexy with cistocele and rectocele. In recent years, changes in attitudes toward sexuality, psychological value of reproductive organs and the desire to preserve fertility have led to a growing interest in uterine-preserving surgery for Pelvic Organ prolapse. Minimally invasive procedures derived from sacrocolpopexy are considered the gold standard in the treatment of apical Pelvic Organ prolapse. However, dissection at the level of the promontory may be challenging, particularly in obese women and when an anatomical variation exists. This may be associated with rare but serious neurological or ureteral morbidity as well as life-threatening vascular injury. Materials and methods: Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. Local institutional review board was consulted, and this study was exempted from approval. Results: Our technique entails 2 times. During the vaginal time, a polypropylene mesh is fixed to the cervical fascia and the 2 extremities are introduced in the abdominal cavity through the Douglas pouch. During the laparoscopic time, a retroperitoneal tunnel is made along the walls of the lateral abdominal walls; thereafter, each of the 2 extremities of the mesh is passed through the omolateral tunnel and "tension-free" suspended to the abdominal wall. Conclusion: Our combined technique may allow a safer approach, reducing the risks of serious complications. Moreover, it leads to a more physiological orientation of the vaginal axis. Further controlled studies are needed to confirm our suggestion.
Contained specimen morcellation during robotics-assisted laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse

Nicole Falus,George Lazarou,Iwona Gabriel,Nicholas Sabatino,Bogdan Grigorescu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05586-2

Abstract:Introduction and hypothesis: Robotics-assisted laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (RALSH) with concomitant apical robotics-assisted POP repair provides advantages of minimally invasive procedures; however specimen removal without intraperitoneal spillage of potential pathology remains challenging. The primary aim of our study is to determine the factors affecting contained manual morcellation (CMM) of specimens during RALSH for POP surgery. The secondary aim of the study is to report complications associated with CMM and on specimen pathology. Methods: A total of 67 sequential patients underwent RALSH with concomitant robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy or uterosacral vaginal suspension. Factors analyzed to affect CMM were specimen weight, length of skin and fascia incisions, patient age, body mass index (BMI), and estimated blood loss (EBL). Results: Median CMM time was 11 min (1 to 46) and specimen weight 62 g (19 to 711). Median patient age was 56 years (36 to 83), and patient BMI was 28 (18 to 44). Median EBL was 50 ml (10 to 150). Median skin and fascial incision lengths were 3 cm (1.5 to 7), and 3.5 cm (1.5 to 8). CMM time was significantly dependent on specimen weight (p < 0.0001) and length of rectus fascia incision (p < 0.0126). There was no gross tissue spillage or bag ruptures. Uterine pathology revealed normal tissue (26%), leiomyoma (47%), adenomyosis (49%), and endometriosis (14%). 4.5% of specimens had evidence of microscopic neoplasm, and 5 years after surgery patients were cancer free. Conclusion: Contained manual extraction of the uterus and/or adnexae at the time of RALSH for POP surgery is a viable, safe, and efficient method of specimen removal.
[Use of a new type of hydrogel in bone surgery].

L. Haisovă,I. Dylevský,V. Pávek,P. Korbelár,J. Vacík

1990-09-01

Abstract:The authors submit information on the properties of a new macroporous hydrogel, which was synthetized specially for use in bone surgery. In animal experiments the authors evaluate microscopically the biocompatibility and process of biodegradation of the implant in osseous tissue.
Analysis of the Clinical Value of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy to Support the Posterior Compartment in Women with Multicompartment Prolapse Including Rectocele

Simone Aichner,Andreas Studer,Janine Frey,Christine Brambs,Jörg Krebs,Corina Christmann-Schmid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175051

IF: 3.9

2024-08-27

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background/Objectives: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is regarded as the gold standard treatment for apical or multicompartment prolapse, predominantly with anterior compartment descent. However, the optimal surgical approach for concurrent rectocele is still debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in managing multicompartment prolapse with concurrent rectocele (≥stage II), analyzing the anatomical outcomes, the necessity for concomitant or subsequent posterior repair, and the impact on bowel function in women undergoing surgery. Methods: Data from all women who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without posterior repair between 01/2017 and 07/2022 for symptomatic multicompartment prolapse, including apical and posterior compartment descent ≥ stage II, were retrospectively evaluated. All women underwent a standardized urogynecological examination, including assessment of genital prolapse using the POP-Q quantification system, and completed the German-validated Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire before and after surgery (6–12 weeks). Preoperative anatomic support and bowel symptoms were compared with postoperative values. Results: In total, 112 women met the criteria for surgical correction. The majority (87%) had stage II posterior descent, with only 10% undergoing concurrent posterior repair during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Significant (p < 0.001) objective improvement was seen for all compartments post- compared with preoperatively (Ba: 0 (−1/2) vs. −3 (−3/−2), C: −1 (−2/0) vs. −8 (−12/−7), Bp: 0 (−1/0) vs. −3 (−2/−2); (median (25%/75% quartiles)). Subsequent surgery for persistent rectocele and/or stool outlet symptoms was required in 4% of cases. Most bowel-specific questions in the German-validated Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire showed significant improvement (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Nerve-sparing sacrocolpopexy alone appears to be a suitable surgical approach to correct multicompartment prolapse, including a rectocele ≥ stage II, and results in a reduction of objective signs and symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse.

medicine, general & internal
Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis

Li Yan,Shentao Lu,Chengzhi Zhao,Li Lei,Lubin Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.12.011

IF: 4.314

2022-12-22

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Abstract:Study Objective : To compare the long-term outcomes and complications of three different variants of laparoscopic sacropexy. Design Single-center retrospective cohort study. Setting A tertiary university hospital. Patients A total of 483 patients with advanced uterine prolapse who underwent laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSH), laparoscopic supra-cervical hysterectomy with concomitant laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy (LSCH+LSC), or total laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (TLH + LSC). Interventions Demographic data, POP-Q scores, questionnaire results, surgical conditions, postoperative outcomes and complications were all extracted from medical and follow-up records. Measurements and Main Results Between April 2012 and December 2020, 277 women underwent LSH, 95 women underwent LSCH+LSC, and 111 women underwent TLH + LSC. LSH procedures was associated with statistically significantly least blood loss, least postoperative hospital days and catheterization days (all p <.001). During the median follow-up of 32 months (13–117 months), analysis of the data revealed notable anatomical correction in all groups regarding POP-Q measurements ( p <.001), and the anatomic cure rate showed no significant difference among these three groups ( p =.273). No statistically significant differences were detected for prolapse recurrence ( p =.171) and functional improvements among these groups. Neither intraoperative injuries ( p =.098) nor total postoperative complications ( p =.218) differed considerably, whereas the rate of severe postoperative complications ( p <.001) including mesh exposure ( p =.004) was significantly higher in the TLH+LSC group than that in the other groups. Conclusions : LSH is the appropriate choice for women with uterine prolapse without contraindications for uterine preservation. For patients with benign uterine lesions and a normal cervix, LSCH+LSC is a safer approach that provides similar anatomical results and improved quality of life scores that are similar to those of TLH+LSC. For patients with lesions in the uterus and cervix, TLH + LSC should be selected.

obstetrics & gynecology
Identification of key success factors and challenges for ERP systems — A systematic literature review

S. Wijaya,Harjanto Prabowo,Meyliana,R. Kosala

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMCOM.2017.8167091

2017-05-01

Abstract:Organizations need information system as a tool for decision making. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are a tool of information systems to achieve work efficiency. ERP systems are the best solution to maintain a competitive advantage for most organizations. Successful implementations of ERP systems have a lot of benefits for the organizations. But the fact that many organizations have failed in implementing ERP systems, but also many organizations have succeeded in implementation of ERP systems. It is the challenge for the organizations to implementation of ERP systems success. The purpose of this study is to propose identify key success factors and challenges for ERP systems. This study employs Systematic. Literature Review approach for review and summary about the key success factors of ERP implementation.
Medium-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pubocervical Fascia Reconstruction and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with Posterior Approach for a Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Study of 124 Cases

Yunshan Zhu,Xiao Zhang,Danxia Chen,Guangxiao Li,Shanliang Shang,Jianqiong Li,Jianhua Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2023.11.005

2023-01-01

Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery

Abstract:Objective: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common gynecological disease in middle-aged and older women that seriously affects patients' physical health and quality of life, increases the financial burden for patients, and becomes a major public health concern. The aim of this study was to investigate the medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic pubocervical fascia reconstruction and sacrospinous ligament fixation with a posterior approach for patients with severe POP. Methods: Patients with severe POP quantitation stage III-IV who underwent laparoscopic pubocervical fascia reconstruction and sacrospinous ligament fixation with a posterior approach at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine between September 2016 and December 2020 were enrolled in this study. The results and complications were recorded. Data were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In total, 124 patients were analyzed. Patients were followed up for 32.27 +/- 12.90 months. The objective cure rate for patients who underwent hysterectomy was 91.7% (100/109), with 7 (6.4%) patients had anterior vaginal wall prolapse and 2 (1.8%) patients had posterior vaginal wall prolapse. The objective cure rate for patients who retained uterus was 66.7% (10/15). All 5 patients with recurrence had uterine prolapse, and 3 (20.0%) of them also had anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Conclusions: Laparoscopic pubocervical fascia reconstruction and sacrospinous ligament fixation with the posterior approach is a safe, minimally invasive, and effective method for patients with severe POP. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm the clinical effects. (c) 2023 Zhejiang University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Pressure-Flow Relationship in Swine Ureter: Effect of Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition by L-NAME

A. Rubini,M. Redaelli,M. Bondí

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000241667

2009-10-01

Urologia Internationalis

Abstract:Introduction: The purpose of this report is to elucidate the possible role of nitric oxide (NO) in modulating smooth muscle tone of swine ureteral wall and its hydraulic resistance to urinary flow. Materials and Methods: We performed direct monitoring of perfusion pressure for different flows in isolated fresh swine ureter. Fluid used for perfusions was saline or L-NAME 200 μmol saline added, and relative pressure-flow relationships were obtained. Results: The general shape of pressure-flow relationships indicates a decrease of ureteral hydraulic resistance with increasing flow. NO synthase inhibition by L-NAME caused a statistically significant increase of perfusion pressures for every tested flow, hence of ureteral hydraulic resistance. Conclusions: Our data show an effective role of NO in modulating ureteral flow resistance, and suggest possible pharmacological implications. A simple mathematical approach to define hydraulic ureteral flow resistance for low and high urinary flows is also suggested.
Laparoscopic Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Case Series

Irina Niţu,Vasile Sârbu,Silvia Savin,Neacşu Sabina,Silvia Șerban,Stere Popescu,Teodor Ștefan Niţu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.119.eC.3004

Abstract:Background: Pelvic static disorders have an important impact on patients' quality of life, constituting a real public health problem, despite the fact that they are not life-threatening. Minimally invasive procedures of pelvic organ prolapse has many advantages, laparoscopic hysteropexy and colpopexy being a standard with real benefits: minimal incisions, reduced postoperative complications, shorter hospital stay and a low recurrence rate. Laparoscopic management of such cases is recommended, but requires teams well trained in minimally invasive surgery. Case presentation: We presented a series of successful cases of two patients with grade III hysterocele, respectively vaginal vault prolapse, who were treated minimally invasively with a lateral laparoscopic hysteropexy, respectively lateral laparoscopic colpopexy. Given the well-known benefits of minimally invasive surgery, we chose laparoscopic surgery because of the smaller surgical impact and faster return to normal life. The surgical procedures were performed successfully, without complications, with rapid recovery, without recurrence. Conclusion: Hysteropexy and laparoscopic colpopexy are safe and effective surgical procedures in selected cases.
Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Irene Porcari,Pier Carlo Zorzato,Mariachiara Bosco,Simone Garzon,Francesca Magni,Stefano Salvatore,Massimo P. Franchi,Stefano Uccella

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15343

2024-01-27

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract:Background Previous reviews on hysterectomy versus uterine‐sparing surgery in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair did not consider that the open abdominal approach or transvaginal mesh use have been largely abandoned. Objectives To provide up‐to‐date evidence by examining only studies investigating techniques currently in use for POP repair. Search Strategy MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to January 2023. Selection Criteria We included randomized and non‐randomized studies comparing surgical procedures for POP with or without concomitant hysterectomy. Studies describing open abdominal approaches or transvaginal mesh implantation were excluded. Data Collection and Analysis A random effect meta‐analysis was conducted on extracted data reporting pooled mean differences and odds ratios (OR) between groups with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main Results Thirty‐eight studies were included. Hysterectomy and uterine‐sparing procedures did not differ in reoperation rate (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.74–1.17), intraoperative major (OR 1.34; 95% CI 0.79–2.26) and minor (OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.79–2.4) complications, postoperative major (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.85–2.37) and minor (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.9–1.53) complications, and objective (OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.92–2.07) or subjective (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.8–1.88) success. Uterine preservation was associated with a shorter operative time (−22.7 min; 95% CI –16.92 to −28.51 min), shorter hospital stay (−0.35 days, 95% CI –0.04 to −0.65 days), and less blood loss (−61.7 mL; 95% CI –31.3 to −92.1 mL). When only studies using a laparoscopic approach for both arms were considered, no differences were observed in investigated outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions No major differences were observed in POP outcomes between procedures with and without concomitant hysterectomy. The decision to preserve or remove the uterus should be tailored on individual factors.

obstetrics & gynecology

Le transit baryté en double contraste dans le diagnostic des ulcérations gastriques

Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study

Advantages of robotic surgery in the treatment of complex pelvic organs prolapse

Transvaginal Single-Port Laparoscopy Sacrocolpopexy

Effectiveness of laparoscopic pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

Reviewer ' s report Title : High prevalence of myofascial trigger points in patients with shoulder pain

Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes

Transvaginal Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy

Improvement in Quality of Life after Laparoscopic or Robotic-assisted Sacrocolpopexy with a Single Anterior Mesh in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Institution

A New Combined Laparoscopic-Vaginal Lateral Suspension Procedure for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Contained specimen morcellation during robotics-assisted laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse

[Use of a new type of hydrogel in bone surgery].

Analysis of the Clinical Value of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy to Support the Posterior Compartment in Women with Multicompartment Prolapse Including Rectocele

Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis

Identification of key success factors and challenges for ERP systems — A systematic literature review

Medium-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pubocervical Fascia Reconstruction and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with Posterior Approach for a Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Study of 124 Cases

Pressure-Flow Relationship in Swine Ureter: Effect of Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition by L-NAME

Laparoscopic Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Case Series

Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis