Abstract:Advances in stent technology and the design of endovascular devices with thinner struts, anti‐inflammatory and antithrombotic polymers, and better drug kinetics have enhanced the safety and efficacy of the second‐generation drug‐eluting stents and broadened their use in the therapy of high‐risk patients and complex anatomies. However, despite these developments, in‐stent restenosis and stent thrombosis remain the Achilles' heel of percutaneous coronary intervention, with their cumulative incidence reaching up to 10% at 5 years following percutaneous coronary intervention. The treatment of stent failure poses challenges and is associated with a worse prognosis than conventional percutaneous coronary intervention. Several studies have recently highlighted the value of intravascular imaging in identifying causes of stent failure, underscored its role in treatment planning, and registries have shown that its use may be associated with better clinical outcomes. The present review aims to summarize the evidence in the field; it discusses the value of intravascular imaging in identifying the mechanisms of in‐stent restenosis and stent thrombosis in assessing the morphological characteristics of neointima tissue that appears to determine long‐term outcomes in evaluating procedural results, and presents the findings of studies supporting its value in guiding therapy in stent failure. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms DCB drug‐coated balloon DES drug‐eluting stent ISR in‐stent restenosis IVBT intravascular brachytherapy POBA plain old balloon angioplasty ST stent thrombosis TLR target lesion revascularization WSS wall shear stress New developments in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technology, including the design of efficient guidewires, adjunctive PCI devices, and advances in stent technology, have simplified the procedure, reduced the risk of complications, increased procedural success, and improved long‐term outcomes, especially in high‐risk patients and complex lesions. Nevertheless, in selected patients and in challenging anatomies, the event rate remains high. 1 In‐stent restenosis (ISR) constitutes the most common cause of stent failure in the United States and United Kingdom, 2 , 3 and its management is challenging because reintervention is needed in 10.3% to 36.8% of the patients at 3‐year follow‐up. 4 , 5 Although the incidence of stent thrombosis (ST) has been considerably reduced after the introduction of the second‐generation drug eluting stents (DES) as shown in clinical trials, in clinical practice, the ST rates are higher and are associated with devastating consequences, because in such cases the clinical presentation is often death or myocardial infarction. 6 , 7 , 8 Over the past years, several endovascular therapies have been introduced to successfully treat ISR that were evaluated in numerous randomized control studies (Figure S1, Table S1). Despite the undoubted value of these studies in clinical practice, they all had a significant limitation: they did not use intravascular imaging to identify the underlying mechanisms of stent failure and assess neointima characteristics that are likely to affect clinical outcomes. Intravascular imaging studies have underscored the importance of correcting causes of stent failure and the role of neointima composition on vessel wall response after repeat revascularization. Consequently, the routine use of intravascular imaging has IIa/C indication in the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for detecting causes of stent failure and personalizing therapy. 9 This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview in the field, discusses the potential value of intravascular imaging in identifying causes of ISR and ST, presents clinical outcomes from small‐scale studies assessing different interventional strategies in challenging scenarios, and proposes a treatment algorithm that relies on the information derived from intravascular imaging to effectively treat ISR and ST. UNDERLYING MECHANISMS OF IN‐STENT RESTENOSIS The introduction of DES and developments in stent polymers and drug kinetics have si -Abstract Truncated-

Clinical Impact of Intracoronary Imaging in the Management of Stent Thrombosis

Clinical Significance of Optical Coherence Tomography–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In‐Stent Restenosis Within Drug‐Eluting Stents: Impact on Patient Outcomes

Impact of intravascular imaging on mortality in patients undergoing left main coronary artery PCI. Propensity score matching analysis of the high-volume single centre registry

Post-dilatation Improves Stent Apposition in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Receiving Primary Percutaneous Intervention: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Using Optical Coherence Tomography.

Intracoronary Imaging for Changing Therapeutic Decisions in Patients with Multivascular Coronary Artery Disease

Long-term safety and feasibility of three-vessel multimodality intravascular imaging in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the IBIS-4 (integrated biomarker and imaging study) substudy

Intracoronary Electrocardiography-guided Strategy for the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Intracoronary thrombolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of Intravascular Imaging, Functional, or Angiographically Guided Coronary Intervention

Intravascular Imaging and 12-Month Mortality After Unprotected Left Main Stem PCI: An Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database

Intravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials

Impact of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Stent Optimization According to Clinical Presentation in Patients Undergoing Complex PCI

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Intracoronary imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: from evidence to guidelines

Intravascular Imaging for Guiding In‐Stent Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis Therapy

Trends and impact of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography on percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction

Is cutting-edge imaging technology superior to conventional angiography in improving outcomes of coronary artery stenting?

Intracoronary imaging guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions: how and when to apply validated metrics to improve the outcome

Intravascular imaging in coronary stent restenosis: Prevention, characterization, and management

Present Clinical Practices and Future Outlooks

Intracoronary Stent Implantation under Intracoronary Ultrasound Guidance with Aspirin and Ticlopidine Therapy.