From Storage to Survivorship: A Scoping Review of Young Adult Cancer Survivors' Experiences and Preferences in Reproductive Survivorship Care after Fertility Tissue Preservation

Mrs Rebecca Mottram,Professor Richard G Feltbower,Professor Georgina Jones,Dr Sarah Gelcich,Mrs Heather Rostron,Mrs Majorie Allen,Professor Adam W Glaser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2024.08.009

2024-08-26

Abstract:Background: Childhood cancer treatment can lead to subfertility in adulthood. Fertility tissue preservation offers a way to safeguard future fertility, especially for prepubescent children, whose preservation options are limited. While this is a significant technological advance, it also presents unique challenges compared to other methods of fertility preservation. Clinical consensus is that all childhood cancer patients should receive high-quality, personalised survivorship care and that healthcare policy and practice must address the expectations and priorities of care recipients. We report the available information on the experiences of cancer survivors who preserved tissue for future fertility, to support the development of survivorship care informed by recipients' perspectives and experiences to identify future research priorities. Methods: We conducted a scoping review following the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR). We searched for research that included patient reported outcomes from patients who underwent fertility tissue preservation (FTP) in childhood and early adulthood, following a cancer diagnosis, including outcomes reported by parents. Our search terms aimed to identify literature reporting on both ovarian and testicular tissue preservation. We searched Embase, Cinahl, PsycInfo, Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews alongside sources of grey literature, for relevant articles including all time-frames between 1980-2023, with support from an independent information specialist at the University of Leeds. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data and we present the results in tabular form to summarise the key information. Results: From 1956 unique records, 5 met our inclusion criteria. No literature was found reporting on the experiences of people who stored testicular tissue. The available literature only included reports from people who had stored ovarian tissue. We found that young women who had stored ovarian tissue faced complex emotional and ethical dilemmas in reproductive decisions post cancer and strongly desired their own biological children. Conclusions: This scoping review is the first to report beyond clinical outcomes by focusing specifically on the self-reported outcomes of patients who preserved ovarian tissue in early life after a cancer diagnosis. It provides valuable insights into their experiences and highlights that ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) presents distinct challenges compared to other forms of fertility preservation. We recommend separate consideration of the needs of patients with stored fertility tissue and call for further research to enable personalized survivorship care. To develop tailored care pathways for long-term well-being, patient-reported outcomes are also needed from individuals with stored testicular tissue, parents who consented to their child's tissue storage, and the healthcare professionals involved in their care. This review underscores a significant evidence gap between rapid FTP advancements and the availability of comprehensive care addressing these advancements. As FTP science evolves, patients need detailed information for informed decisions and ongoing support for their unique reproductive and endocrine health concerns throughout their survivorship journey.