Discovery of VU6007496: Challenges in the Development of an M1 Positive Allosteric Modulator Backup Candidate

Julie L Engers,Katrina A Bollinger,Rory A Capstick,Madeline F Long,Aaron M Bender,Jonathan W Dickerson,Weimin Peng,Christopher C Presley,Hyekyung P Cho,Alice L Rodriguez,Colleen M Niswender,Sean P Moran,Zixiu Xiang,Anna L Blobaum,Olivier Boutaud,Jerri M Rook,Darren W Engers,P Jeffrey Conn,Craig W Lindsley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.4c00508
2024-08-28
Abstract:Herein we report progress toward a backup clinical candidate to the M1 positive allosteric modulator (PAM) VU319/ACP-319. Scaffold-hopping from the pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine-based M1 PAM VU6007477 to isomeric pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridine and thieno[3,2-b]pyridine congeners identified several backup contenders. Ultimately, VU6007496, a pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridine, advanced into late stage profiling, only to be plagued with unanticipated, species-specific metabolism and active/toxic metabolites which were identified in our phenotypic seizure liability in vivo screen, preventing further development. However, VU6007496 proved to be a highly selective and CNS penetrant M1 PAM, with minimal agonism, that displayed excellent multispecies IV/PO pharmacokinetics (PK), CNS penetration, no induction of long-term depression (or cholinergic toxicity) and robust efficacy in novel object recognition (minimum effective dose = 3 mg/kg p.o.). Thus, VU6007496 can serve as another valuable in vivo tool compound in rats and nonhuman primates, but not mouse, to study selective M1 activation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?