Abstract:Abstract Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin is widely recommended for clinical treatment. Due to the complexity of 24-h area under the curve (AUC) guided vancomycin monitoring in clinical practice, the vancomycin trough level remains the most common and practical method. The purpose of this study was designed to investigate the differences in the safety and efficacies of vancomycin TDM based on the two different monitoring methods, and further explore the clinical application of trough-guided vancomycin monitoring in patients with gastrointestinal cancer requiring mechanical ventilation. Methods We included a total of 78 gastrointestinal cancer patients who required mechanical ventilation due to various diseases. All patients included in this study were aged 18 years or older and were treated with intravenous vancomycin therapy for more than 2 days due to documented or suspected Gram-positive bacterial infections, and have at least one available vancomycin plasma concentration. First, we compared the safety and efficacies of vancomycin TDM based on different monitoring methods as trough-guided monitoring or AUC-guided monitoring. Then, based on whether the initial vancomycin concentration achieving the target trough concentration (less than 48 h), patients were divided into early and delayed groups, and the clinical factors were compared between them. The primary endpoints include the incidence of new-onset acute kidney injury (AKI) or renal replacement therapy (RRT), clinical success rate and 28-day all-cause mortality. Finally, the overall relationship between trough concentration and potential covariates is screened by univariate and multivariate analysis to explore potential information covariates. Results The research revealed that patients with gastrointestinal cancer exhibited significantly lower initial vancomycin trough concentrations (median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 6.90[5.28-11.20] mg/L). And there were no statistically significant differences in the safety and efficacies of vancomycin TDM based on the two different monitoring methods for the primary endpoint. Moreover, base on trough-guided vancomycin monitoring, the early group demonstrated a notably shorter duration of mechanical ventilation compared with the delayed group (χ 2 = 4.532; p < 0.05; Fig. 2E). Propensity score weighting further confirmed that the duration of mechanical ventilation (χ 2 = 6.607; p < 0.05; Fig. 2F) and duration of vasoactive agent (χ 2 = 6.106; p < 0.05; Fig. 2D) were significantly shorter in the early group compared with delayed group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that Cystatin C (Cys-C) was the most important variable for vancomycin target trough achievement (odds ratio, 5.274; 95% CI, 1.780 to 15.627; p = 0.003). Conclusions Trough-guided vancomycin monitoring is a simple and effective marker of TDM for ventilated patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Timely achievement of target trough concentrations for vancomycin can improve partial clinical outcomes in Gram-positive bacterial infections. Cys-C level is a potentially valuable parameter for predicting the vancomycin concentration.

Automated calculation and reporting of vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve: a simplified single-trough concentration-based equation approach

Interinstitutional Comparison of Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Estimation in Korea: Need for Standardized Operational Protocols for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Consultation

Simulation of Vancomycin Exposure Using Trough and Peak Levels Achieves the Target Area under the Steady-State Concentration-Time Curve in ICU Patients

Predicting the Area under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) for First Dose Vancomycin Using First-Order Pharmacokinetic Equations

Vancomycin area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration and trough level concordance–evaluation on an urban health unit

Identification of Patients Who Require Two-Point Blood Sampling for the Peak and Trough Values Rather Than One-Point Blood Sampling for the Trough Value for the Evaluation of AUC of Vancomycin Using Bayesian Estimation

Is it time to recommend AUC-based vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring only? A cross-sectional survey in China

Characterizing Day 1 Area Under the Curve Following Vancomycin Loading Dose Administration in Adult Hospitalized Patients Using Non-Trapezoidal Linear Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Retrospective Observational Study

Pathway of vancomycin dosage decision based on therapeutic drug monitoring

Vancomycin therapeutic monitoring by measured trough concentration versus Bayesian-derived area under the curve in critically ill patients with cancer

Implementing AUC Monitoring in a Pharmacist-Managed Vancomycin Dosing Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Vancomycin AUC0-24 estimation using first-order pharmacokinetic methods in pediatric patients

The monitoring of vancomycin: a systematic review and meta-analyses of area under the concentration-time curve-guided dosing and trough-guided dosing

Application of Pharmacometrics in Pharmacotherapy: Open-Source Software for Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Management

Implementation of vancomycin AUC/MIC dosing vs traditional trough dosing and incidence of acute kidney injury at a rural community hospital

A Comparison of Vancomycin Area Under the Curve and Trough Concentration in Specific Populations

Switching Vancomycin Monitoring From Trough Concentration to Area Under the Curve Estimation by Bayesian Forecasting: A Short Communication on a Cost-Benefit Study in Resource-Limited Settings

Clinical application of vancomycin TDM in ventilated patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis

Model‐informed precision dosing of vancomycin for rapid achievement of target area under the concentration‐time curve: A simulation study

Determination of a vancomycin nephrotoxicity threshold and assessment of target attainment in hematology patients

Is It Still Beneficial to Monitor the Trough Concentration of Vancomycin? A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Nephrotoxicity and Efficacy