Progression independent of relapse activity in relapsing multiple sclerosis: impact and relationship with secondary progression
Emilio Portaccio,Matteo Betti,Ermelinda De Meo,Ilaria Addazio,Luisa Pastò,Lorenzo Razzolini,Rocco Totaro,Daniele Spitaleri,Alessandra Lugaresi,Eleonora Cocco,Marco Onofrj,Franco Di Palma,Francesco Patti,Davide Maimone,Paola Valentino,Valentina Torri Clerici,Alessandra Protti,Diana Ferraro,Giacomo Lus,Giorgia Teresa Maniscalco,Vincenzo Brescia Morra,Giuseppe Salemi,Franco Granella,Ilaria Pesci,Roberto Bergamaschi,Umberto Aguglia,Marika Vianello,Marta Simone,Vito Lepore,Pietro Iaffaldano,Giancarlo Comi,Massimo Filippi,Maria Trojano,Maria Pia Amato,the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12448-4
2024-05-29
Journal of Neurology
Abstract:Objectives We investigated the occurrence and relative contribution of relapse-associated worsening (RAW) and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) to confirmed disability accrual (CDA) and transition to secondary progression (SP) in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods Relapsing-onset MS patients with follow-up > / = 5 years (16,130) were extracted from the Italian MS Registry. CDA was a 6-month confirmed increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. Sustained disability accumulation (SDA) was a CDA with no EDSS improvement in all subsequent visits. Predictors of PIRA and RAW and the association between final EDSS score and type of CDA were assessed using logistic multivariable regression and multivariable ordinal regression models, respectively. Results Over 11.8 ± 5.4 years, 16,731 CDA events occurred in 8998 (55.8%) patients. PIRA (12,175) accounted for 72.3% of CDA. SDA occurred in 8912 (73.2%) PIRA and 2583 (56.7%) RAW ( p < 0.001). 4453 (27.6%) patients transitioned to SPMS, 4010 (73.2%) out of 5476 patients with sustained PIRA and 443 (24.8%) out of 1790 patients with non-sustained PIRA. In the multivariable ordinal regression analysis, higher final EDSS score was associated with PIRA (estimated coefficient 0.349, 95% CI 0.120–0.577, p = 0.003). Discussion In this real-world relapsing-onset MS cohort, PIRA was the main driver of disability accumulation and was associated with higher disability in the long term. Sustained PIRA was linked to transition to SP and could represent a more accurate PIRA definition and a criterion to mark the putative onset of the progressive phase.
clinical neurology