Abstract:Abstract Background Respect for patients’ autonomy is usually considered to be an important ethical principle in Western countries; privacy is one of the implications of such respect. Healthcare professionals frequently encounter ethical dilemmas during their practice. The past few decades have seen an increased use of courts to resolve intractable ethical dilemmas across both the developed and the developing world. However, Chinese and American bioethics differ largely due to the influence of Chinese Confucianism and Western religions, respectively, and there is a dearth of comparative studies that explore cases of ethical dilemmas between China and the United States. Methods This paper discusses four typical cases with significant social impact. First, it compares two cases concerning patient privacy: the “Shihezi University Hospital Case”, in which a patient was used as a clinical teaching object without her permission, and the “New York-Presbyterian Hospital Case”, in which the hospital allowed the filming of a patient’s treatment without his consent. Second, it compares two cases regarding patient autonomy and potentially life-saving medical procedures: the “Case of Ms. L”, concerning a cohabitant’s refusal to sign a consent form for a pregnant woman’s caesarean, and the “Case of Mrs. V”, concerning a hospital’s insistence upon a blood transfusion for a dissenting patient. This paper introduces the supporting and opposing views for each case and discusses their social impact. It then compares and analyses the differences between China and the United States from cultural and legislative perspectives. Conclusions Ethical dilemmas have often occurred in China due to the late development of bioethics. However, the presence of bioethics earlier in the US than in China has not spared the US of ethical dilemmas. This paper highlights lessons and inspiration from the cases for healthcare professionals and introduces readers to the role and weight of privacy and autonomy in China and in the US from the perspectives of different cultures, religions and laws.

Patient Autonomy Versus Intervention: Geriatric Care Dilemmas

Attitudes Toward the American Nutrition Guidelines for the Critically Ill Patients of Chinese Intensive Care Physicians.

Patient privacy and autonomy: a comparative analysis of cases of ethical dilemmas in China and the United States

Gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced dementia or near end of life

Physicians' behavior regarding non-acceptance of oral restriction (nil per os) by dysphagic patient with risk of laryngotracheal aspiration

The Differences and Perspectives Between Elderly Individuals and Their Surrogates Regarding End-of-Life Care: A Mixed Methods Study

American Geriatrics Society Feeding Tubes in Advanced Dementia Position Statement

Ethical Issues in Geriatric Gastroenterology

Moral dilemmas associated with the withdrawal of artificial hydration

End-of-Life Decision Making in Patients with Advanced Dementia: The Perspectives of the Korean General Population and Clinicians

Clinical Outcomes of Tube Feeding vs. Hand Feeding in Advanced Dementia

Refusal of care in vulnerable people: Case of the elderly

Chinese familial tradition and Western influence: a case study in Singapore on decision making at the end of life

Geriatric Gastroenterology: A Geriatrician’s Perspective

Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients

Enteral Nutrition by Nasogastric Tube in Adult Patients under Palliative Care: A Systematic Review

Parenteral Nutrition in cancer patients outside of oncologic treatment: bioethical perspective.

Do Perceptions about Palliative Care Affect Emergency Decisions of Health Personnel for Patients with Advanced Dementia?

Ethical considerations of medical nutritional therapy at end of life: the Israel perspective

Fostering relational autonomy in end-of-life care: a procedural approach and three-dimensional decision-making model

Ethical concerns in caring for persons with anorexia nervosa: content analysis of a series of documentations from ethics consultations