Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT As lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIF) are increasingly performed, our understanding of postoperative clinical trajectories are important in informing preoperative patient expectations. While minimum clinically important difference (MCID) rates are widely utilized in spine surgery literature, there is less published on how long it takes for patients to achieve MCID following LLIF. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the length of time it takes for patients to report MCID achievement for back pain, leg pain, disability, and physical function and evaluate predictors of time to achieve MCID. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This is a retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing elective LLIF with baseline and postoperative patient-reported outcomes reported. OUTCOME MEASURES Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), VAS-Back, VAS-Leg, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) METHODS Patients undergoing elective LLIF by the senior author with baseline and postoperative PROs recorded were retrospectively identified. Data on potential predictors of time to MCID achievement were gathered including demographics, comorbidities, diagnostic information, and baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs). MCID achievement rates for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale-Back (VAS-Back), VAS-Leg, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) were calculated at six-, twelve, 6 month- 1 year- and 2-year postoperative timepoints. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to determine the proportion of patients achieving MCID at each timepoint. A multivariate Cox regression determined predictors of time to MCID achievement. RESULTS One hundred and five patients were included in the analysis. The mean time to achieve MCID for PROMIS-PF was 44.7 weeks, for VAS-Back was 38.5 weeks, for VAS-Leg was 36.7 weeks and for ODI was 38.3 weeks. Worse baseline VAS-Back significantly predicted for earlier MCID achievement for VAS-Back (HR: 1.55), while diabetes was predictive of later MCID achievement (HR: 0.21). Higher body mass index and worse preoperative ODI predicted earlier MCID achievement for ODI (HR: 1.04-1.08), and higher VAS-Leg score, and two-level fusion were predictive of later MCID achievement for ODI, (HR:0.26-0.81). Worse preoperative VAS-Leg, isthmic spondylolisthesis, and three-level fusion were predictors of earlier achievement of MCID for VAS-Leg (HR: 1.27-6.47). Herniated nucleus pulposus and foraminal stenosis were early predictors (HR: 2.92-3.23) and workers' compensation was a late predictor of MCID attainment for PROMIS-PF (HR: 0.13). CONCLUSIONS Select demographic variables, comorbidities, spinal pathology, and preoperative PROs influenced the time it took for patients to report clinically significant improvements in pain, disability, and physical function scores. These findings can be used to prognosticate outcomes for patients undergoing LLIF and inform patient expectations of postoperative recovery. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Preoperative Symptom Duration and the Effect on Clinical Outcomes and PROMIS-PF in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-reported Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

How Do Functional Comorbidities Affect PROMIS-PF Scores Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery?

Preoperative Resilience and Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusion

P282. Predictors of time to achieve clinically significant improvements following lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Effect of the duration of chronic low back pain on pain sensitivity of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery

Predictors of time to achieve clinically significant improvements following lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Comparison of Lumbar Fusion With and Without Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT)

Preoperative predictors of prolonged hospitalization in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Risk factors for extended hospital stay following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Radiculopathy

788 Impact of Preoperative Mental Health State on Perioperative Surgical Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Fusions: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2009-2020)

Impact of Preoperative Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Lumbar Fusion

Fibromyalgia as a Predictor of Increased Postoperative Complications, Readmission Rates, and Hospital Costs in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Spine Fusion

Impact of Postoperative Length of Stay on Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Preoperative motor weakness and the impact on patient reported outcomes in lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Does Preoperative Back Pain Impact Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis?

The Impact of Perioperative Multimodal Pain Management on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients (Aged 75 and Older) Undergoing Short-Segment Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Correlations Between Psychiatric Disorders and Perioperative Outcomes After Lumbar Fusions: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2009-2020)

Effect of Residual Pain After Posterior Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disorders on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Two-Year Follow-Up Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

One Year Patient Reported Outcomes After Single-Level Lumbar Fusion at Orthopedic Specialty Hospital Compared to Tertiary Referral Center