Rapid detection of imipenem/relebactam susceptibility/resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Maxime Bouvier,Mohamed Bachtarzi,Laurent Poirel,Patrice Nordmann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116474
2024-07-30
Abstract:Objectives: Imipenem-relebactam (IPR) has been reported to exhibit a good activity against non-metallo-ß-lactamase carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), and the rapid detection of susceptibility/resistance to this new therapeutic alternative may be crucial. Therefore, the Rapid IPR Pseudomonas NP test was developed to quickly identify IPR susceptibility/resistance among multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Methods: The principle of the Rapid IPR Pseudomonas NP test is based on visually detecting glucose metabolization by observing (or not) a color change from yellow to red or orange of the red phenol pH indicator in the presence of imipenem at 2 mg/L and relebactam at 4 mg/L A total of 80 clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were analyzed, among which 42 isolates were IPR resistant according to EUCAST guidelines (MICs, susceptible ≤2 mg/L, resistant >2 mg/L). Results obtained with the Rapid IPR Pseudomonas NP test were compared with the reference broth microdilution (BMD). Results: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the test were found to be 100 %, 89.5 % and 95 %, respectively, using the BMD reference method as a comparator. Moreover, five out of the IPR-susceptible isolates (n = 38) exhibiting an MIC of IPR close to the breakpoint (MIC = 1 mg/L, n = 2; MIC = 2 mg/L, n = 3) yielded to a major error result, namely a positive result with the rapid IPR Pseudomonas NP test (resistance). By contrast, all IPR-resistant isolates (n = 42) were all correctly categorized. Conclusions: The Rapid IPR Pseudomonas NP test is sensitive, specific, and easy to perform and interpret. Therefore, it is suitable for implementation in routine clinical laboratories.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?