Abstract:AlphaFold2 (AF2) and RoseTTaFold (RF) have revolutionized structural biology, serving as highly reliable and effective methods for predicting protein structures. This article explores their impact and limitations, focusing on their integration into experimental pipelines and their application in diverse protein classes, including membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and oligomers. In experimental pipelines, AF2 models help X-ray crystallography in resolving the phase problem, while complementarity with mass spectrometry and NMR data enhances structure determination and protein flexibility prediction. Predicting the structure of membrane proteins remains challenging for both AF2 and RF due to difficulties in capturing conformational ensembles and interactions with the membrane. Improvements in incorporating membrane-specific features and predicting the structural effect of mutations are crucial. For intrinsically disordered proteins, AF2's confidence score (pLDDT) serves as a competitive disorder predictor, but integrative approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations or hydrophobic cluster analyses are advocated for accurate dynamics representation. AF2 and RF show promising results for oligomeric models, outperforming traditional docking methods, with AlphaFold-Multimer showing improved performance. However, some caveats remain in particular for membrane proteins. Real-life examples demonstrate AF2's predictive capabilities in unknown protein structures, but models should be evaluated for their agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, AF2 models can be used complementarily with MD simulations. In this Perspective, we propose a "wish list" for improving deep-learning-based protein folding prediction models, including using experimental data as constraints and modifying models with binding partners or post-translational modifications. Additionally, a meta-tool for ranking and suggesting composite models is suggested, driving future advancements in this rapidly evolving field.

Structure prediction of alternative protein conformations

AlphaFold2's training set powers its predictions of fold-switched conformations

AlphaFold predictions of fold-switched conformations are driven by structure memorization

Proteins with alternative folds reveal blind spots in AlphaFold-based protein structure prediction

Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2

Modeling conformational states of proteins with AlphaFold

Predicting the alternative conformation of a known protein structure based on the distance map of AlphaFold2

Predicting relative populations of protein conformations without a physics engine using AlphaFold2

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

Prediction of peptide structural conformations with AlphaFold2

High-throughput prediction of protein conformational distributions with subsampled AlphaFold2

Protein Multiple Conformation Prediction Using Multi-Objective Evolution Algorithm

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

AlphaFold2 Predicts Alternative Conformation Populations in Green Fluorescent Protein Variants

Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome

The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins

Reconstructing protein structures by neural network pairwise interaction fields and iterative decoy set construction

Learning inverse folding from millions of predicted structures

In Silico Structural Analysis Exploring Conformational Folding of Protein Variants in Alzheimer's Disease

SPEACH_AF: Sampling protein ensembles and conformational heterogeneity with Alphafold2