The role of sex and age in the differential efficacy of 10 Hz and intermittent theta-burst (iTBS) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD)

Aaron R Slan,Cole Citrenbaum,Juliana Corlier,Doan Ngo,Nikita Vince-Cruz,Nicholas J Jackson,Thomas E Valles,Scott A Wilke,Gil D Hoftman,Ralph J Koek,Michael K Leuchter,David E Krantz,Thomas B Strouse,Reza Tadayonnejad,Nathaniel D Ginder,Margaret G Distler,John H Lee,Adesewa E Adelekun,Evan H Einstein,Hanadi A Oughli,Andrew F Leuchter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.129
2024-08-24
Abstract:Background: Sex- and age-dependent outcome differences have been observed in treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), including 10 Hz repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). We examined whether there are sex- and age-dependent differences in outcome with intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS), another rTMS protocol. Methods: The relationship between biological sex, age, and treatment outcome was retrospectively examined among 414 patients with MDD treated with 10 Hz or iTBS rTMS. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to examine the association between treatment and change in the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR30) score from baseline to treatments 10 and 30, with biological sex (M/F), protocol (iTBS/10 Hz), age (≥/<50 years old), and time (treatment 1/10/30) included as fixed effects. The three-way sex-protocol-time and age-protocol-time interactions were used to determine any differential relationships between protocol and outcome dependent on sex and age. Post-hoc t-tests were conducted to examine differences in improvement. Results: There was a significant three-way sex-protocol-time interaction at treatments 10 (p = 0.016) and 30 (p = 0.031). Males showed significantly greater improvement with iTBS than females at treatments 10 (p = 0.041) and 30 (p = 0.035), while females showed numerically greater improvement with 10 Hz treatment. While there was not a significant three-way age-protocol-time interaction, there was a significant interaction between age (≥50 years old) and time at treatments 10 (p = 0.007) and 30 (p = 0.042), and among age, sex, and time at treatment 30 (p = 0.028). Limitations: Retrospective naturalistic treatment protocol. Conclusions: iTBS appeared less efficacious in females than in males, and rTMS overall was more efficacious in patients over fifty, particularly females.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?