Comparative Effectiveness of Dupilumab and Omalizumab on Asthma Exacerbations and Systemic Corticosteroid Prescriptions: Real-World US ADVANTAGE Study

Eugene Bleecker,Michael Blaiss,Juby Jacob-Nara,Lynn Huynh,Mei Sheng Duh,Tracy Guo,Mingchen Ye,Richard H Stanford,Zhixiao Wang,Xavier Soler,Arpita Nag,Radhika Nair,Kinga Borsos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.029
2024-08-24
Abstract:Background: In the US, dupilumab is approved for moderate-to-severe eosinophilic or oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma, while omalizumab is approved for managing moderate-to-severe allergic asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids. However, limited comparative effectiveness data exist for these biologics due to differing patient characteristics and treatment histories. Objective: This analysis assessed the real-world effectiveness of dupilumab and omalizumab for asthma among patients in the US. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, TriNetX Dataworks electronic medical record data were used to identify asthma patients (age: ≥12 years) who initiated (index) dupilumab or omalizumab between November 2018 and September 2020, and who had at least 12 months of pre- and post-index clinical information. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance potential confounding in treatment groups. Asthma exacerbation rates and systemic corticosteroid (SCS) prescriptions were compared using a doubly robust negative binomial regression model, adjusting for baseline exacerbation/SCS rates and patient characteristics with ≥10% standardized differences after IPTW. Results: Overall, 2,138 patients in dupilumab and 1,313 in omalizumab treatment groups met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. After weighting, the majority of baseline characteristics were balanced (standard difference <10%) between the two groups. Dupilumab was associated with a 44% lower asthma exacerbation rate (p<0.0001) than omalizumab. Additionally, dupilumab treatment significantly (p<0.05) reduced SCS prescriptions by 28% during the follow-up period compared to omalizumab treatment. Conclusion: The US ADVANTAGE real-world study demonstrated a significant reduction in severe asthma exacerbations and SCS prescriptions for patients prescribed dupilumab compared to those prescribed omalizumab during 12 months of follow-up.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?