Abstract:Background: Failure to fix the fractured fragment can result in bony fragment resorption and consequent glenoid bone loss. Current arthroscopic repair techniques might lead to insecure fixation and refracture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the transosseous sling-suture technique for bony Bankart lesions, and to compare the clinical outcomes for acute and chronic bony Bankart lesions treated with this technique.Methods: A retrospective case series consisting of 46 patients with bony fracture of the glenoid rim following traumatic injury was identified from May 2015 to August 2020. The patients were divided into the acute lesion group and the chronic lesion group according to the time from first injury to surgery. The size of bone fragment was used to group the patients into the small and the medium sized fragment groups. All the patients underwent arthroscopic repairs using the transosseous sling-suture technique. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations including Rowe score, West Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain scores, ROMs and number of dislocations were recorded. No significant differences were found in the comparisons of postoperative ROMs ang functional outcomes regarding between the small and the medium sized fragment groups.Results: No dislocations occurred for both groups postoperatively. At the last follow-up, all the ROMs (including anterior flexion, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation at the side), the Rowe score, the WOSI score and the VAS score for pain in the both groups were significantly improved compared to the preoperative evaluations (all Ps < 0.001). In the comparisons between the acute and the chronic lesion groups, significantly greater anterior flexion (158.9 +/- 8.9 degrees vs. 153.0 +/- 6.4 degrees, P = 0.037), abduction (167.7 +/- 10.1 degrees vs. 161.0 +/- 7.0 degrees, P = 0.035) and external rotation at the side (88.3 +/- 6.4 degrees vs. 83.5 +/- 5.5 degrees, P = 0.024) were found in the acute lesion group. The comparisons of the Rowe score (86.0 +/- 7.5 vs. 87.5 +/- 10.6, P = 0.319), the WOSI score (223.5 +/- 56.3 vs. 185.0 +/- 79.9, P = 0.062), the VAS score for pain (0.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.2, P = 0.324) and the internal rotation at the side (74.6 +/- 13.2 degrees vs. 80.5 +/- 11.1 degrees, P = 0.116) between these two groups did not demonstrate significant differences between the two groups.Conclusion: This arthroscopic transosseous sling-suture repair technique for shoulder anterior instability with acute and chronic bony Bankart lesion can restore joint stability, improve clinical outcomes and range of motion postoperatively. The acute bony Bankart lesion using the current technique can produce better range of motion compared to the chronic lesion.Study design: Retrospective case series; Level of evidence, 4.(c) 2023 Asia Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Fixation Results in Similar Clinical Outcomes, Less Range of Motion Limitation but Poorer Quality of Reduction compared to Open Screw Fixation for Acute Large Anterior Glenoid Rim Fractures

Subjective and Objective Outcome after Revision Arthroscopic Stabilization for Recurrent Anterior Instability Versus Initial Shoulder Stabilization

All-Suture Anchor vs. Knotless Suture Anchor for the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability—A Prospective Cohort Study

Knotless Bioabsorbable Anchors Placed on the Glenoid Face for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Arthroscopic Fixation of Avulsion Fractures of the Lesser Tuberosity of the Humerus: Clinical Outcomes With a Mean 3.5-Year Follow-up

Arthroscopic Repair with Transosseous Sling-Suture Technique for Acute and Chronic Bony Bankart Lesions

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary vs. revision arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction with distal tibial allograft for anterior shoulder instability with bone loss

Arthroscopy-Assisted Reduction and Internal Fixation versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Glenoid Fracture with Scapular Involvement: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Cross Pin Versus Interference Screw for Femoral Graft Fixation in Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

An All-Suture Anchor Offers Equivalent Clinical Performance to an Established Solid Suture Anchor in the Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial with 12-Month Follow-Up

Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Technique for Repairing Rotator Cuff Tears: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

An All-Suture Anchor Offers Equivalent Clinical Performance to an Established Solid Suture Anchor in the Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Trial With 12-Month Follow Up

The Relationship Between All-Suture and Solid Medial-Row Anchors and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Double-Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair

Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations

Biomechanical comparison shows increased stability of an arthroscopic subscapular sling procedure compared to an open Latarjet reconstruction for anterior shoulder instability in specimens with major glenoid bone defect

All-Suture and Solid Medial Row Anchors Produce Similar Clinical Outcomes for Double Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair (227)

Arthroscopic Versus Open Latarjet in the Treatment of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation With Marked Glenoid Bone Loss: A Prospective Comparative Study

Promising clinical effect of arthroscopic autologous iliac bone grafting with suture anchor binding fixation for recurrent anterior shoulder instability

An axillary approach for open reduction and internal fixation to treat anterior glenoid fracture: an anatomical and clinical study

Clinical outcome of arthroscopic acromioplasty vs. arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for irreparable rotator cuff tears: A3-year follow-up

Plate Fixation Versus Arthroscopic‐Assisted Plate Fixation for Isolated Medium‐Sized Fractures of the Greater Tuberosity: A Retrospective Study