Stapedotomy for Pediatric Middle Ear Anomalies With Facial Nerve Bifurcation: A Case Report

Yuki Miura,Masao Noda,Ryota Koshu,Makoto Ito
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.65391
2024-07-25
Cureus
Abstract:The intricate distribution of the facial nerve within the temporal bone is crucial in otological surgery. Anomalous facial nerve pathways are occasionally observed in middle ear malformations, although intra-tympanic bifurcation of the facial nerve is rare. When managing ossicular malformations with atypical facial nerve trajectories, hearing reconstruction should be prioritized based on the trajectory pattern and presence of the oval window. In this case, stapes surgery was performed due to facial nerve bifurcation within the tympanic cavity. In this case report, a 15-year-old female underwent stapes surgery due to gradually worsening conductive hearing loss. She was monitored at another hospital because of left-sided hearing loss at birth screening using automated auditory brainstem response. Her left ear initially had mild hearing loss, while her right ear remained within normal limits. However, her hearing deteriorated progressively, leading to significant daily challenges by age seven, prompting referral to our hospital. Intraoperatively, findings included defects in the incus-long process and stapes head, along with facial nerve bifurcation around the oval window, and the stapes footplate had poor flexibility. Stapedotomy was performed cautiously to preserve the facial nerve, utilizing a Teflon piston wire for sound transmission reconstruction. Postoperatively, the patient experienced no complications or facial nerve palsy, with hearing improving to 28.8 dB. Understanding the precise pathophysiology of middle ear anomalies is crucial for selecting appropriate surgical approaches. Even though the anomalies could not be evaluated prior to surgery, surgeons must carefully consider the risk of facial nerve injury and choose the optimal technique and reconstruction method tailored to each case, as predicting outcomes solely from preoperative evaluations can be challenging.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?