Association Between Calculated Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (sdLDL-C) and Soft Carotid Plaques on CT Angiogram of the Head and Neck

Thulasi Rajan,Ganesh M,Sowmya K,Easwar L
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.65292
2024-07-24
Cureus
Abstract:Background: Cerebrovascular accident (CVA), also commonly known as stroke, is an acute condition characterized by jeopardized perfusion of the brain tissue. Atherosclerosis is a common converging point for the various risk factors for CVA. It is a chronic, evolving condition of the vessel wall characterized by peculiar lesions known as atheromas. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been one of the established and traditional risk factors for the development of plaques in atherosclerosis. Small dense LDL-C (sdLDL-C) is a subclass of LDL-C that is considered more atherogenic, and its role in atherosclerotic plaque formation has been very well established. Hence, in this study, we aimed to find the association between calculated sdLDL-C and atherosclerotic carotid plaque (including various plaque characteristics). Materials and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute between December 2022 and December 2023 after getting ethics approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Patients who underwent CT angiogram (312) were included in the study, and their lipid profile data were collected from the Laboratory Information System. Participants were divided into groups depending on the presence or absence of carotid plaque, the characteristics of the plaque, and the narrowing caused by the plaque. sdLDL-C was calculated using Sampson formula from the lipid parameters in these groups. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS Statistics version 16.0 (SPSS Inc. Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc.). A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: sdLDL-C was significantly higher in the plaque group (37.25 ± 13.69 mg/dL) when compared to the group without plaques on CT angiogram (34.09 ± 11.64 mg/dL) (p<0.05), wherein the LDL-C wasn't significantly different between the two groups. sdLDL-C was also elevated in the soft plaque sub-group (39.46 ± 13.63 mg/dL) when compared to the calcific plaque sub-group (35.41 ± 13.05 mg/dL), which was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: sdLDL-C is associated with atherosclerotic carotid plaques, especially the soft plaques on CT angiogram, which are considered to be vulnerable plaques. Thus, calculated sdLDL-C can be utilized as a cost-effective tool to assess plaque vulnerability and monitor hypolipidemic treatment in addition to LDL-C.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?