Abstract:Objective: A retrospective single-center study is reported here to assess the safety and long-term effectiveness of applying a fibrin sealant (FS) sac-filling strategy to eliminate type IA endoleak (TIAE) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods: Characteristics of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients who had challenging proximal aortic neck anatomy (short or angulated) and underwent FS sac filling to resolve TIAE after traditional EVAR in Changhai Hospital between December 2006 and July 2010 were collected and reviewed. Intrasac pressure was measured with a preloaded catheter before and after FS filling to observe the immediate curative effect. The 7-to 10-year long-term effect was evaluated on the basis of the occurrence of endoleak, maximum aneurysm diameter, all-cause mortality, and other severe complications by annual aortic computed tomography angiography check. Results: There were 107 patients with short (<= 15 mm; 83/107 [77.6%]) or angulated (>60 degrees; 27/107 [25.2%]) aneurysm neck who underwent FS sac filling. The mean age of the patients was 71.16 +/- 12.1 years (68 male patients). Of the 107 endoleaks, 106 (106/107 [99.1%]) were resolved, and 3 (3/107 [2.8%]) patients died in the perioperative period. Intrasac systolic, diastolic, mean, and pulse pressures decreased significantly in the treated cases (systolic pressure, 114.1 +/- 16.7 mm Hg vs 59.5 +/- 20.4 mm Hg; diastolic pressure, 65.06 +/- 10.4 mm Hg vs 51.4 +/- 18.2 mm Hg; mean pressure, 81.3 +/- 11.4 mm Hg vs 54.1 +/- 18.8 mm Hg; pulse pressure, 49.1 +/- 12.8 mm Hg vs 8.2 +/- 5.2 mm Hg; P < .01). During a median follow-up period of 89.1 months, the mean maximum aneurysm diameter became significantly smaller than that observed before the operation (53.23 +/- 10.9 mm vs 59.86 +/- 11.77 mm). The postoperative maximum aneurysm diameter decreased in 76 patients and was stable in 22 patients. One patient with aneurysm enlargement was transferred to open surgery because of a type IV endoleak, and another patient with no blood flow into the aneurysm sac observed by computed tomography angiography was closely followed up. Four patients received repeated endovascular treatment after the occurrence of type IB endoleak and aneurysm enlargement. After a median follow-up of 89.1 months, the cumulative survival rate was 90.7%, 80.4%, 72.0%, 58.9%, and 51.4% after 1 year, 3 years, 6 years, 8 years, and 10 years after the operation, respectively. There was no recurrent type I endoleak, distal embolization, migration, kinking, ormalfunction after FS injections during the perioperative period and follow-up. Conclusions: FS sac filling combined with intrasac pressure measurement is a simple and effective treatment method to eliminate TIAE after EVAR, especially for patients with challenging proximal neck anatomy. This method could expand the current indications of EVAR.

[Effect of long-term aspirin treatment on aneurysm sac after endovascular aortic repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a propensity score matched analysis]

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a new stent graft:early results from a multicenter study

Antiplatelet Therapy, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Progression, and Clinical Outcomes

The impact of regular aspirin use on aneurysm recanalization rates after endovascular coiling

Effects of Aspirin Therapy on Bypass Efficacy and Survival of Patients Receiving Direct Cerebral Revascularization

Early Intervention Effects of Open Repair and Endovascular Aortic Repair on Patients Suffering from 40-54 Mm Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Single Center Experience.

[Preventive myocardial revascularization prior to abdominal aortic repair in patients without cardiac symptoms: long-term results]

Impact of Isolated Type 2 Endoleak on Subsequent Cardiovascular Events and Mortality

The impact of dyslipidemia on prognosis of patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Prior abdominal surgery is not associated with 30-day mortality or morbidities after endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm

Propensity Score Matched Comparison of EndoSuture versus Fenestrated Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Unfavorable Neck Anatomy

Long-term Outcome of Sac Filling with Fibrin Sealant after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Challenging Aortic Neck Anatomy

[Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: a Clinical Report of 81 Cases].

Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair Within and Outside the Instructions for Use in Korean Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Treatment strategies for endoleak after endovascular repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm: A single center retrospective study

Long-term Efficacy of Fibrin Sealant Treating Proximal Type Ⅰ Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Prospective Clinical Controlled Study on Endovascular Repair Versus Conventional Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Influence of Endoleak Positions on the Pressure Shielding Ability of Stent-Graft after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA)

[Short to Midterm Results of Endovascular for 105 Case of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms].

Amount of Intraluminal Thrombus Correlates with Severe Adverse Events in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Impaired Pre-operative Ambulatory Capacity in Patients Undergoing Elective Endovascular Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair is Associated with Increased Peri-operative Death∗