A phase III randomized controlled trial of plitidepsin, a marine derived compound, in hospitalized adults with moderate COVID-19

Pedro Landete,Olga-Adriana Caliman-Sturdza,Jose A Lopez-Martin,Liliana Preotescu,Mihaela-Catalina Luca,Anastasia Kotanidou,Paula Villares,Shirley-Patricia Iglesias,Pablo Guisado-Vasco,Elena-Maria Saiz-Lou,Maria Del Carmen Farinas-Alvarez,Esperanza Merino de Lucas,Eduardo Perez-Alba,Jose-Miguel Cisneros,Vicente Estrada,Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio,Garyfallia Poulakou,Miguel Torralba,Jesus Fortun,Paula Garcia-Ocana,Adrien Lemaignen,Miguel Marcos-Martin,Maria Molina,Roger Paredes,Maria Teresa Perez-Rodriguez,Dimitar Raev,Pablo Ryan,Fernanda Meira,Javier Gomez,Nadia Torres,Diego Lopez-Mendoza,Jose Jimeno,Jose-Felipe Varona
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae227
2024-08-26
Abstract:Background: Plitidepsin has shown potent preclinical activity against SARS-CoV-2 and was generally well tolerated in a Phase I trial of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. NEPTUNO, a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of plitidepsin in the management of moderate COVID-19 in hospitalized adult patients. Methods: Included patients had documented SARS-CoV-2 infection, required oxygen therapy, and had adequate organ function. The planned sample size was 609 patients. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to at least 3 days of dexamethasone plus either plitidepsin (1.5 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day, for 3 days) or standard of care (control). The primary endpoint was the time to sustained withdrawal of supplemental oxygen. Secondary endpoints included time to sustained hospital discharge, clinical status, duration of oxygen support, percentage of patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit, and safety. Findings: After randomizing 205 patients, NEPTUNO was discontinued due to a notable drop in COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Available data suggest a 2-day improvement in the median time to sustained oxygen therapy discontinuation (5 vs 7 days) favoring both plitidepsin arms (hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.96, p=0.08 for plitidepsin 1.5 mg vs control; HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.73-1.53, p=0.78 for plitidepsin 2.5 mg vs control). Plitidepsin was generally well tolerated. Interpretation: Despite the trial limitations, these results suggest that plitidepsin may have a positive benefit-risk ratio in the management of patients requiring oxygen therapy. Further studies with plitidepsin, including those in immunosuppressed patients, are warranted. Funding: This trial has been funded by Pharmamar, S.A. (Madrid, Spain).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?