Impact of transcranial electrical stimulation on simultaneous stereoelectroencephalography recordings: A randomized sham-controlled study

Sara Simula,Julia Makhalova,Francesca Pizzo,Elodie Garnier,Giada Damiani,Borja Mercadal,Maria Chiara Biagi,Ricardo Salvador,Samuel Medina-Villalon,Giulio Ruffini,Fabrice Wendling,Christian George Bénar,Fabrice Bartolomei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.08.003
2024-08-14
Abstract:Objective: Clinical exploitation of transcranial electrical stimulation for focal epilepsy treatment lacks quantification of the underlying neurophysiological changes. This study explores the immediate effects of transcranial alternating (tACS) and direct (tDCS) current stimulation on local and network brain activity using simultaneous stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) recordings. Methods: Patients were randomized for personalized tACS (n = 5) or tDCS (n = 6). Active stimulation (20 min) was preceded by sham stimulation (20 min). Changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IED), functional connectivity (FC) and power spectral density (PSD) were quantified against baseline. Results: Results demonstrated variable responses. Spike rate decreased in 2/6 subjects following sham and tDCS, while 2/6 showed an increase. Alpha power and aperiodic PSD components generally increased during and after tDCS but decreased following tACS. FC changes varied among subjects and were detectable even during sham sessions. Conclusions: Strong variability suggests that tES does not have a univocal effect on immediate changes in IED or FC, possibly due to the single session format and challenges in affecting subcortical areas. Significance: This is the first study to examine intracranial FC changes during tACS and tDCS, highlighting the importance of sham comparisons and individual variability in tES response, offering valuable insights into its application for epilepsy treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?