Untangling diagnostic confusion in internal abdominal hernias
Aziz Ahmet Surel,Nurullah İshak Işık,Merve Yazla
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.36037
Abstract:Background: Internal hernias involve the herniation of intestines through mesenteric or peritoneal defects in the gastrointestinal system. Etiologically, they are generally classified as congenital or acquired. Internal hernias often present with non-specific symptoms. Despite the increased use of computed tomography (CT), discrepancies between imaging findings and diagnostic accuracy continue to pose challenges for clinicians. This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain and receiving a preliminary internal hernia diagnosis through CT, followed by laparotomy. Methods: Our research is a retrospective, observational, and descriptive study. It includes patients presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain, who were provisionally diagnosed with internal hernia based on CT. Patient data recorded age, gen-der, CT-identified internal hernia type, surgery, diagnoses, hospitalization status, duration of hospital stay, bowel resection, mortality, and blood parameters. The Welch classification was used to categorize internal hernia types, with eight types examined. Results: Among 112 patients with a preliminary internal hernia diagnosis based on abdominal CT, the median age was 52 years. Of these, 46 were female and 66 were male. Among all patients, 87 were admitted to the hospital for observation and surgery, while 25 were discharged after emergency department. Paraduodenal hernias were the most common provisional diagnosis (48 cases). Among these patients, 45 were discharged after symptom relief and were advised for elective re-evaluation. The exact diagnosis for these pa-tients remains unknown. Post-surgery, the diagnosis of internal hernia was confirmed in 32 cases. Among them, 15 were female and 17 were male, with a median age of 52. The median hospital stay for patients diagnosed with internal hernia was 5 days. Although acquired hernias exhibited higher resection and mortality rates, no statistically significant difference was found. Thirty-five cases received dif-ferent diagnoses: 19 had brid ileus, five had volvulus, six had acute appendicitis, one had duodenal perforation, three had gynecological malignancies, and one had renal malignancy. Conclusion: Although internal hernias are rare, early diagnosis and treatment are very important due to the high risk of death. The study findings indicate that increased CT utilization leads to earlier diagnosis and treatment, resulting in improved prognosis for patients. This study holds one of the largest case series in the literature. It provides a novel perspective by evaluating radiologically-diagnosed cases, confirming diagnoses post-surgery, and comparing conditions that mimic internal hernias, thereby making a valuable contribution to the literature.