Insights into clinical phenotypes and treatment responses in a Small cohort of Taiwanese patients with SCN1A variants: A Preliminary study

Yu Min Syu,Inn-Chi Lee,Jyh-Feng Lu,Pi-Lien Hung,Syuan-Yu Hong,Ming-Tao Yang,Jao-Shwann Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2024.03.013
2024-08-19
Abstract:Background: SCN1A channelopathy is the most well-known cause for epileptic encephalopathies and contributes to a wide phenotypic spectrum. The variable expressivity is troublesome for the interpretation of clinical significance and prognoses. To investigate the clinical manifestations, medications and outcomes of patients with SCN1A channelopathies, we conducted this observation retrospective study in Taiwan. Methods: A cohort consisting of 16 patients (5 males and 11 females) from multiple centers with identified SCN1A variants was investigated and phenotypically relevant factors were recorded. The variants were identified using NGS and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. A panel of 90 epileptic-related genes was used to identify SCN1A variants and to evaluate some of the potential SCN1A modifier genes. Results: The mean age of seizure onset was 10.4 months. Twelve of the sixteen patients (75%) had different degrees of neurocognitive sequela and psychobehavioral comorbidity in our cohort. Cognitive impairment was noted in all ten patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) and in two of the patients with non-DS phenotypes. A lower response rate to medications was also noted in patients with DS. Notably, a medication-specific tendency towards valproic acid (VPA), clobazam (CLB), and levetiracetam (LEV) was observed, revealing the effective pharmacotherapies for SCN1A-related seizures. An asymptomatic carrier with a reported pathogenic SCN1A variant was reviewed along with her monozygotic twin sister with DS. Nine novel SCN1A mutations are herein reported, eight of which being classified as pathogenic. Conclusion: Our study revealed unfavorable outcomes for patients with SCN1A variants. Some patients with SCN1A channelopathy showed specific responsiveness to the pharmacotherapies previously either recommended or contraindicated for these patients. Our study also expands the genotype and provides valuable prognostic insights in patients with SCN1A channelopathy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?