Comparison of conventional resection to D3 lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Praachi Raje,Swati Sonal,Hiroko Kunitake,David L Berger,Grace C Lee,Rocco Ricciardi,Satoru Morita,Kohei Shigeta,Koji Okabayashi,Robert N Goldstone
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115911
2024-08-20
Abstract:Background: Lymphadenectomy during right hemicolectomy for colon cancer varies between the U.S. and Japan. Methods: Patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for non-metastatic right-sided colon cancer between 2010 and 2019 ​at U.S. and Japanese institutions were compared. Outcomes included survival, pathologic findings, and postoperative complications. Results: 319 American patients (57 ​% female, mean age 70 years) underwent conventional resection and 308 Japanese patients (52 ​% female, mean age 70 years) underwent extended dissection. The conventional group underwent more laparotomies (26.6 ​% vs. 8.4 ​%, p ​< ​0.001), had more poorly differentiated histology (31.7 ​% vs. 11.0 ​%, p ​< ​0.01), lower lymph node yield (M ​= ​27 ​± ​11 vs. M ​= ​32 ​± ​14, p ​< ​0.001), and more 30-day readmissions (31 vs. 5, p ​< ​0.001). Adjusting for demographics, pathology, perioperative outcomes, and adjuvant chemotherapy, extended lymphadenectomy improved disease-free survival (HR 0.50; 95 ​% CI, 0.31-0.80; p ​= ​0.004), but not overall survival (HR 0.98; 95 ​% CI, 0.95-1.02; p ​= ​0.14). Conclusions: Extended lymphadenectomy for right sided-colon cancer improves disease-free, but not overall, survival among Japanese patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?