[Porous corundum ceramics in clinical use].

J. Bieniek,L. Oleszkiewicz

Chirurgia Narządów Ruchu i Ortopedia Polska

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Effect of temperature on the resonant macroscopic quantum tunneling in small Josephson junctions

B. Ruggiero,P. Silvestrini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/77.403243

IF: 1.9489

1995-06-01

IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity

Abstract:The study of the quantum behaviour of Josephson junctions is interesting not only by itself, but also for the technological importance in electronics employing superconducting weak links. Recently great attention has been devoted to the effects of Resonant Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling (RMQT) between levels the same energy in neighbouring wells of the potential shape describing the junction. This can produce voltage spikes along the supercurrent branch of the I-V curves and peaks in the current switching distributions. Schmidt, Clealand, and Clarke have presented a detailed analysis of the resonant tunnel dynamics for the T=0 case. The present paper is based on a different theoretical approach, first proposed by Larkin and Ovchinnikov, which allows one to include explicitly the temperature. We study the phenomenon in its time dependence and this allows us to consider the lifetime of the voltage spikes as well as the effect of the RMQT on the quantum escape rate out of the V=0 state.<<ETX>>
Integrating equity frameworks into surgical quality improvement and health administrative databases: A narrative review

Adom Bondzi-Simpson,Tiago Ribeiro,Natalie G Coburn,Julie Hallet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.08.009

Abstract:Ensuring safe, timely, and effective surgery is critical for high-quality healthcare and is the goal of surgical quality monitoring systems. At the heart of these systems are health administrative databases which house patient clinico-demographic information, healthcare processes and outcomes. Through analysis of monitoring systems outputs, we can identify gaps within healthcare delivery, patient experience, and surgical outcomes. However, gaps in our healthcare can only be measured by the variables we collect. Equity stratifiers are sociodemographic descriptors that can identify patient populations who experience differences in health and healthcare that may be considered unjust or unfair. They include age, education, gender, geographic location, income, Indigenous identity, racialized group, and sex at birth. These equity stratifiers represent measurable components of the social determinants of health housed within health administrative databases and allow for standardized analysis and reporting of health inequity. However, not all databases collect these stratifiers - making granular analysis of patient subgroups who may experience health inequity impossible to measure. Moreover, in databases that do collect this information, a wide range in the classification systems used makes for comparisons across jurisdictions challenging. The focus of this narrative review will be to apply the principles of the equity stratifier framework to examine what measures are collected in surgical quality improvement databases, cancer monitoring systems and provincial/state health administrative databases in the United States of America and Canada. The goal of this narrative review is to 1) inform researchers, surgeons, and policymakers of the current landscape of social variables collected within common health administrative databases. 2) Outline the pros and cons of the current collection system. 3) Issue a call to action for policymakers to incorporate health equity frameworks into the collection and reporting of data.
Using a health equity lens to measure patient experiences of care in diverse healthcare settings

Annette J. Browne,Colleen Varcoe,Marilyn Ford-Gilboe,C. Nadine Wathen,Erin Wilson,Vicky Bungay,Nancy Perrin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.12.24301257

2024-01-15

Abstract:People who are structurally disadvantaged and marginalized often report poor health care experiences due to intersecting forms of stigma and discrimination. There are many measures of patient experiences of care, however, few are designed to measure equity-oriented care. In alignment with ongoing calls to integrate actions in support of health equity, we report on the development and testing of patient experiences of care measures that explicitly use a health equity and intersectional lens. Our analysis focuses on two different equity-oriented health care scales. The first was piloted in a primary health care setting, where patients have an ongoing relationship with providers over time. The second was piloted in an emergency department, where care is provided on an episodic basis. Item Response Theory was used to develop the scales and evaluate their psychometric properties. The primary health care scale, tested with a cohort of 567 patients, showed that providing more equity-oriented health care predicted improvements in important patient self-report health outcomes over time. The episodic scale, tested in an emergency department setting with 284 patients, showed evidence of concurrent validity, based on a high correlation with quality of care. Both scales are brief, easy-to-administer self-report measures that can support organizations to monitor quality of care using an equity lens. The availability of both scales enhances the possibility of measuring equity-oriented health care in diverse contexts. Both scales can shed light on experiences of care using an intersectional lens and equity-oriented lens, providing a nuanced understanding of quality of care.

Health Systems and Quality Improvement
An equity indicator for assessing mental healthcare access: a national population case study

S. Dawadi,F. Shawyer,E. Callander,S. Patten,B. Johnson,S. Rosenberg,V. Lakra,E. Lin,H. Teede,G. Meadows,J. Enticott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796024000738

2024-11-30

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

Abstract:Aims Achieving equitable healthcare access is a global challenge. Improving whole-population mental health and reducing the global burden of mental disorders is a key recommendation of the 2018 Lancet Global Mental Health Commission, which proposed monitoring national indicators, including the proportion of people with severe mental disorders who are service-users. This study aims to derive an equity indicator from national datasets integrating need, service utilisation and socioeconomic status, and demonstrate its utility in identifying gaps in mental health service use amongst those with the greatest need, thereby guiding equitable healthcare delivery. Methods We present a case study of a universal health insurance scheme (Medicare) in Australia. We developed the equity indicator using three national datasets. Geographic areas were linked to an area-based socioeconomic deprivation quintile (Census 2016). Per geographic area, we estimated the number with a mental healthcare need using scores ≥30 on the Kessler-10 (Australian National Health Surveys 2015 and 2018), and obtained the number of services used, defined as mental health-related contacts with general practitioners and mental health professionals (Medicare administrative data 2015–2019). We divided the number of services by the population with an estimated mental healthcare need and averaged these use-rates across each socioeconomic deprivation quintile. The equity indicator is the ratio of the use-rates in the least versus most deprived quintiles. Results Those estimated to have the greatest need for mental healthcare in 2019 ranged between 8.2% in the most disadvantaged area quintile (Q1) and 2.4% in the least (Q5), corresponding to a proportional increase of 27.7% in Q1 and 19.5% in Q5 since 2015. Equity-indicator-adjusted service rates of 4.2 (3.8–4.6) and 23.9 (22.4–25.4) showed that individuals with the highest need for care residing in Q1 areas received a stark 6 times fewer services compared to their Q5 counterparts, producing an equity indicator of 6. Conclusions As the global prevalence of common mental disorders may be increasing, it is crucial to calculate robust indicators evaluating the equity of mental health service use. In this Australian case study, we developed an equity indicator enabling the direct comparison of geographic areas with different need profiles. The results revealed striking inequities that persisted despite publicly-funded universal healthcare, recent service reforms and being a high-income country. This study demonstrates the importance and feasibility of generating such an indicator to inform and empower communities, healthcare providers and policymakers to pursue equitable service provision.

psychiatry
Through An Equity Lens: Illuminating The Relationships Among Social Inequities, Stigma And Discrimination, And Patient Experiences of Emergency Health Care

Colleen Varcoe,Annette J. Browne,Vicky Bungay,Nancy Perrin,Erin Wilson,C. Nadine Wathen,David Byres,Elder Roberta Price,Colleen Varcoe,Annette J. Browne,Vicky Bungay,Nancy Perrin,Erin Wilson,C. Nadine Wathen,David Byres

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00207314221075515

2022-01-31

International Journal of Health Services

Abstract:People who experience the greatest social inequities often have poor experiences in emergency departments (EDs) so that they are deterred from seeking care, leave without care complete, receive inadequate care, and/or return repeatedly for unresolved problems. However, efforts to measure and monitor experiences of care rarely capture the experiences of people facing the greatest inequities, experiences of discrimination, or relationships among these variables. This analysis examined how patients’ experiences, including self-reported ratings of care, experiences of discrimination, and repeat visits vary with social and economic circumstances. Every consecutive person presenting to three diverse EDs was invited if/when they were able to consent; 2424 provided demographic and contact information; and 1692 (70%) completed the survey. Latent class analysis (LCA) using sociodemographic variables: age, gender, financial strain, employment, housing stability, English as first language, born in Canada, and Indigenous identity, indicated a six-class solution. Classes differed significantly on having regular access to primary care, reasons for the visit, and acuity. Classes also differed on self-reported discrimination every day and during their ED visit, ratings of ED care, and number of ED visits within the past six months. ED care can be improved through attention to how intersecting forms of structural disadvantage and inequities affect patient experiences.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Evaluating Equity in Health Financing Using Benefit Incidence Analysis: A Framework for Accounting for Quality of Care

Augustine Asante,Nicola Man,Virginia Wiseman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-020-00597-2

Abstract:Equity in health care financing has gained increased attention in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) following the renewed global interest in universal health coverage (UHC), a key component of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). UHC requires that people have access to the health services they need without risking financial hardship. Health financing is central to UHC and many LMICs have initiated reforms to align their health financing systems with the goals of UHC. Evaluation of the equity impact of these reforms has become a growing area of research, especially in countries with large health inequalities where the pressure to move towards UHC is most intense and the need for evidence to inform policy most critical. However, current analytical tools for evaluating equity in health financing conspicuously exclude indicators of quality, an important dimension of UHC. The aim of this paper was to address this critical methodological gap by introducing quality scores into benefit incidence analysis (BIA), one of the key techniques for assessing equity in health financing. BIA measures the extent to which different socioeconomic groups benefit from public spending on health care through their use of health services. The benefit (public subsidy) is captured in monetary terms by multiplying the quantity of a particular health service consumed by the unit cost of that service and subtracting any out-of-pocket costs incurred while using the service. It does not account for variations in the quality of health services in the computation of the public subsidy.
Human Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Cultured as Spheroids are Self‐activated to Produce Prostaglandin E2 that Directs Stimulated Macrophages into an Anti‐inflammatory Phenotype

Joni H. Ylöstalo,T. Bartosh,Katie Coble,D. Prockop

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1191

IF: 5.845

2012-10-01

Stem Cells

Abstract:Culturing cells in three dimension (3D) provides an insight into their characteristics in vivo. We previously reported that human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (hMSCs) cultured as 3D spheroids acquire enhanced anti‐inflammatory properties. Here, we explored the effects of hMSC spheroids on macrophages that are critical cells in the regulation of inflammation. Conditioned medium (CM) from hMSC spheroids inhibited lipopolysaccharide‐stimulated macrophages from secreting proinflammatory cytokines TNFα, CXCL2, IL6, IL12p40, and IL23. CM also increased the secretion of anti‐inflammatory cytokines IL10 and IL1ra by the stimulated macrophages, and augmented expression of CD206, a marker of alternatively activated M2 macrophages. The principal anti‐inflammatory activity in CM had a small molecular weight, and microarray data suggested that it was prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). This was confirmed by the observations that PGE2 levels were markedly elevated in hMSC spheroid‐CM, and that the anti‐inflammatory activity was abolished by an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2), a silencing RNA for COX‐2, and an antibody to PGE2. The anti‐inflammatory effects of the PGE2 on stimulated macrophages were mediated by the EP4 receptor. Spheroids formed by human adult dermal fibroblasts produced low levels of PGE2 and displayed negligible anti‐inflammatory effects on stimulated macrophages, suggesting the features as unique to hMSCs. Moreover, production of PGE2 by hMSC spheroids was dependent on the activity of caspases and NFκB activation in the hMSCs. The results indicated that hMSCs in 3D‐spheroid cultures are self‐activated, in part by intracellular stress responses, to produce PGE2 that can change stimulated macrophages from a primarily proinflammatory M1 phenotype to a more anti‐inflammatory M2 phenotype. STEM Cells2012;30:2283–2296
Sentinels of inequity: examining policy requirements for equity-oriented primary healthcare

Josée G. Lavoie,Colleen Varcoe,C. Nadine Wathen,Marilyn Ford-Gilboe,Annette J. Browne,On behalf of the EQUIP Research Team,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3501-3

2018-09-10

BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:BackgroundNon-government, not-for-profit community health centres (CHCs) play a crucial role within healthcare systems in fostering equity, acting both as direct providers of services and as sentinels of health and social inequity. In a study of an intervention to promote equity-oriented health care, we enlisted four diverse primary healthcare clinics with mandates to serve highly marginalized populations. All of these CHCs operate as not-for-profit, non-government organizations (NGOs), and have a marginal relationship financially and socially to other parts of the system. The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the factors that shape how CHCs are able to carry out an equity mandate and, from this, to identify what is required at the level of policy to enhance capacity to provide equity-oriented health care.MethodsWe systematically examined the clinics’ policy and funding contexts, and identified influences on the clinics’ capacities to promote equity-oriented health care.ResultsWe identified three key mechanisms of influence, each playing out against the backdrop of a contested and marginal position of CHCs within the health care system: a) accountability and performance frameworks; b) patterns of funding and allocation of resources, and c) pathways for emergent priorities. We examine these mechanisms, considering how each influenced the pursuit of equity, and propose policy directions to optimize the primary health care sectors’ capacity to support equity-oriented health care.ConclusionsAlthough this analysis is based on a study within a high-income country, we argue that because the dynamics between community health centres and broader healthcare systems are similar across national boundaries, the implications have applicability to low and middle-income countries.

health care sciences & services
Methods to promote equity in health resource allocation in low- and middle-income countries: an overview

James Love-Koh,Susan Griffin,Edward Kataika,Paul Revill,Sibusiso Sibandze,Simon Walker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0537-z

2020-01-13

Globalization and Health

Abstract:Abstract Unfair differences in healthcare access, utilisation, quality or health outcomes exist between and within countries around the world. Improving health equity is a stated objective for many governments and international organizations. We provide an overview of the major tools that have been developed to measure, evaluate and promote health equity, along with the data required to operationalise them. Methods are organised into four key policy questions facing decision-makers: (i) what is the current level of inequity in health; (ii) does government health expenditure benefit the worst-off; (iii) can government health expenditure more effectively promote equity; and (iv) which interventions provide the best value for money in reducing inequity. Benefit incidence analysis can be used to estimate the distribution of current public health sector expenditure, with geographical resource allocation formulae and health system reform being the main government policy levers for improving equity. Techniques from the economic evaluation literature, such as extended and distributional cost-effectiveness analysis can be used to identify ‘best buy’ interventions from a health equity perspective. A range of inequality metrics, from gap measures and slope indices to concentration indices and regression analysis, can be applied to these approaches to evaluate changes in equity. Methods from the economics literature can provide policymakers with a toolkit for addressing multiple aspects of health equity, from outcomes to financial protection, and can be adapted to accommodate data commonly available in low- and middle-income settings.

public, environmental & occupational health
Achieving equity within universal health coverage: a narrative review of progress and resources for measuring success

Anna M Rodney,Peter S Hill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0072-8

2014-10-10

International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract:IntroductionEquity should be implicit within universal health coverage (UHC) however, emerging evidence is showing that without adequate focus on measurement of equity, vulnerable populations may continue to receive inadequate or inferior health care. This study undertakes a narrative review which aims to: (i) elucidate how equity is contextualised and measured within UHC, and (ii) describe tools, resources and lessons which will assist decision makers to plan and implement UHC programmes which ensure equity for all.MethodsA narrative review of peer-reviewed literature published in English between 2005 and 2013, retrieved from PubMed via the search words, `universal health coverage/care’ and `equity/inequity’ was performed. Websites of key global health organizations were also searched for relevant grey literature. Papers were excluded if they failed to focus on equity (of access, financial risk protection or health outcomes) as well as focusing on one of the following: (i) the impact of UHC programmes, policies or interventions on equity (ii) indicators, measurement, monitoring and/or evaluation of equity within UHC, or (iii) tools or resources to assist with measurement.ResultsEighteen journal articles consisting mostly of secondary analysis of country data and qualitative case studies in the form of commentaries/reviews, and 13 items of grey literature, consisting largely of reports from working groups and expert meetings focusing on defining, understanding and measuring inequity in UHC (including recent drafts of global/country monitoring frameworks) were included.DiscussionThe literature advocates for progressive universalism addressing monetary and non-monetary barriers to access and strengthening existing health systems. This however relies on countries being effectively able to identify and reach disadvantaged populations and estimate unmet need. Countries should assess the new WHO/WB-proposed framework for its ability to adequately track the progress of disadvantaged populations in terms of achieving equitable access, effective coverage and financial risk protection within their own settings.ConclusionsRecently published resources contextualise equity as a measurable component of UHC and propose several useful indicators and frameworks. Country case-studies also provide useful lessons and recommendations for planning and implementing equitable UHC which will assist other countries to consider their own requirements for UHC monitoring and evaluation.

public, environmental & occupational health
The geometry of GL(2,q) in translation planesof even order q2

N. Johnson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/S0161171278000459

Abstract:In this article we show the following: Let π be a translation plane of even order q2 that admits GL(2,q) as a collineation group. Then π is either Desarguesian, Hall or Ott-Schaeffer.
Primary care. Where next?

P. Stephenson

2003-03-13

Abstract:
Evaluating engagement with equity in Canadian provincial and territorial primary care policies: Results of a jurisdictional scan

Sarah Spencer,Tai Hollingbery,Aidan Bodner,Lindsay Hedden,David Rudoler,Erin Christian,M Ruth Lavergne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104994

IF: 3.255

2024-01-20

Health Policy

Abstract:Equitable access to primary care is essential to achieving more equitable health outcomes, yet evidence suggests that structurally marginalized populations are less likely to have benefited from varied primary care reforms in Canada. Our objective is to determine how equity is incorporated in public primary care policy and strategy documents across Canada. We conducted string term and snowball searches for provincial/territorial primary care policy documents published between 01 January 2018 and 30 June 2022, extracted the policy objective, and applied a rubric to evaluate each document's engagement with equity. We performed content analysis of the documents which acknowledged inequities and articulated a related policy response. Of the 224 identified documents that discussed primary care policy: 63 (28 %) identified one or more structurally marginalized group(s) experiencing inequities related to primary care, 64 (29 %) identified a structurally marginalized group and articulated a policy response, and 16 (7 %) articulated a detailed policy response to address inequities. Even where policy responses were articulated, in most cases these did not directly address the acknowledged inequities. The absence of measurable goals, meaningful community consultation, and tenuous connections between the policy response and inequities mentioned may help explain persistent inequities in primary care across Canada.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Community design of the Brooklyn Health Equity Index

Aimee Afable,Margaret Salisu,Tenya Blackwell,Anthony Divittis,Mark Hoglund,Gwendolyn Lewis,Carla Boutin-Foster,Montgomery Douglas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae112

2024-09-09

Abstract:Health equity drives quality care. Few reliable metrics that capture patients' perceptions of health equity exist. We report on the development of a patient-centered metric for health systems change in central Brooklyn, which stands out as an outlier in New York City with a disproportionate burden of poverty, disease, and death. A community-engaged, sequential, mixed-methods research design was used. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 80 community and health care stakeholders across central Brooklyn. Candidate items were derived from qualitative themes and examined for face, interpretive validity, and language. Interitem reliability and confirmatory factor analysis was assessed using data collected via text and automated discharge calls among 368 patients from a local hospital. Qualitative data analysis informed the content of 11 draft questions covering 3 broad domains: trust-building, provider appreciation of social determinants of health, and experiences of discrimination. Psychometric testing resulted in a Cronbach's alpha of 0.774 and led to deletion of 1 item, resulting in a 10-item Brooklyn Health Equity Index (BKHI). The 10-item BKHI is a novel, brief, and reliable measure that captures patients' perceptions of inequities and offers a real-time measure for health systems and payors to monitor progress toward advancing health equity.
Composite Indices of Social Determinants of Health: Overview, Measurement Gaps, and Research Priorities for Health Equity

Lisa M Lines,Marque C Long,Sahar Zangeneh,Kelli DePriest,Joy Piontak,Jamie Humphrey,Sujha Subramanian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2023.0106

Abstract:The goal of health equity is for all people to have opportunities and resources for optimal health outcomes regardless of their social identities, residence in marginalized communities, and/or experience with oppressive systems. Social determinants of health (SDOH)-the conditions in which we are born, grow, live, work, and age-are inextricably tied to health equity. Advancing health equity thus requires reliable measures of SDOH. In the United States, comprehensive individual-level data on SDOH are difficult to collect, may be inaccurate, and do not capture all dimensions of inequitable outcomes. Individual area-based indicators are widely available, but difficult to use in practice. Numerous area-level composite indices are available to describe SDOH, but there is no consensus on which indices are most appropriate to use. This article presents an analytic taxonomy of currently available SDOH composite indices and compares their components and predictive ability, providing insights into gaps and areas for further research.
The Silent Scotsman.

W. Waugh

Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract:
Understanding intersectional inequality in access to primary care providers using multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy

Jennifer W. He,Amanda L. Terry,Dan Lizotte,Greta Bauer,Bridget L. Ryan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296657

IF: 3.7

2024-01-19

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background Despite the Canadian healthcare system’s commitment to equity, evidence for disparate access to primary care (PC) providers exists across individual social identities/positions. Intersectionality allows us to reflect the realities of how social power shapes healthcare experiences at an individual’s interdependent and intersecting social identities/positions. The objectives of this study were to determine: (1) the extent to which intersections can be used classify those who had/did not have a PC provider; (2) the degree to which each social identity/position contributes to the ability to classify individuals as having a PC provider; and (3) predicted probabilities of having a PC provider for each intersection. Methods and findings Using national cross-sectional data from 241,445 individuals in Canada aged ≥18, we constructed 320 intersections along the dimensions of gender, age, immigration status, race, and income to examine the outcome of whether one had a PC provider. Multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy, a multi-level model using individual-level data, was employed to address intersectional objectives. An intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 23% (95%CI: 21–26%) suggests that these intersections could, to a very good extent, explain individual variation in the outcome, with age playing the largest role. Not all between-intersection variance in this outcome could be explained by additive effects of dimensions (remaining ICC: 6%; 95%CI: 2–16%). The highest intersectional predicted probability existed for established immigrant, older South Asian women with high income. The lowest intersectional predicted probability existed for recently immigrated, young, Black men with low income. Conclusions Despite a “universal” healthcare system, our analysis demonstrated a substantial amount of inequity in primary care across intersections of gender, age, immigration status, race, and income.

multidisciplinary sciences
Inclusion of Health Equity Initiatives in Hospitals' Strategic Plans

Simone R Singh,Cherie Conley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0183

2023-11-27

Health Equity

Abstract:Objective: This study examined the health equity initiatives included in US hospitals' strategic plans. Methods: Using data from the American Hospital Association (AHA) 2021 Annual Survey, the study described the types of health equity initiatives that US hospitals included in their strategic plans. The analysis focused on the following seven initiatives: (1) equitable and inclusive organizational policies; (2) systematic and shared accountability for health equity; (3) diverse representation in hospital and health care system leadership; (4) diverse representation in hospital and health care system governance; (5) community engagement; (6) collection and use of segmented data to drive action; and (7) culturally appropriate patient care. Logit and zero-truncated Poisson regression analysis was used to examine organizational and community-level characteristics of hospitals with the most comprehensive health equity strategic plans. Results: Of the 4359 general medical and surgical hospitals that completed the AHA's 2021 survey, 45.1% provided complete information on their health equity strategies. The comprehensiveness of hospitals' health equity efforts varied across organizations. Regression analysis showed that larger hospitals, nonprofit hospitals, and hospitals affiliated with health systems tended to have more comprehensive health equity initiatives as did hospitals located in urban areas, hospitals in communities with higher household incomes, and hospitals in communities with greater proportions of Hispanic residents. Conclusions: While improving health and health equity is a key aspect of many hospitals' missions, the extent to which hospitals include health equity initiatives into their strategic plans varied noticeably. Committing to a comprehensive set of efforts aimed at improving health equity requires human and financial resources as well as dedicated leadership.
Using measures of quality of care to assess equity in health care funding for primary care: analysis of Indonesian household data

Manon Haemmerli,Augustine Asante,Dwidjo Susilo,Aryana Satrya,Rifqi Abdul Fattah,Qinglu Cheng,Soewarta Kosen,Danty Novitasari,Gemala Chairunnisa Puteri,Eviati Adawiyah,Andrew Hayen,Lucy Gilson,Anne Mills,Viroj Tangcharoensathien,Stephen Jan,Hasbullah Thabrany,Virginia Wiseman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08739-z

2022-11-16

BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:Many countries implementing pro-poor reforms to expand subsidized health care, especially for the poor, recognize that high-quality healthcare, and not just access alone, is necessary to meet the Sustainable Development Goals. As the poor are more likely to use low quality health services, measures to improve access to health care need to emphasise quality as the cornerstone to achieving equity goals. Current methods to evaluate health systems financing equity fail to take into account measures of quality. This paper aims to provide a worked example of how to adapt a popular quantitative approach, Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA), to incorporate a quality weighting into the computation of public subsidies for health care.

health care sciences & services
Reducing inequality in avoidable emergency admissions: Case studies of local health care systems in England using a realist approach

John Ford,Julia Knight,John Brittain,Chris Bentley,Sarah Sowden,Ana Castro,Tim Doran,Richard Cookson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196211021618

2021-07-21

Abstract:Objective People in disadvantaged areas are more likely to have an avoidable emergency hospital admission. Socio-economic inequality in avoidable emergency hospital admissions is monitored in England. Our aim was to inform local health care purchasing and planning by identifying recent health care system changes (or other factors), as reported by local health system leaders, that might explain narrowing or widening trends. Methods Case studies were undertaken in one pilot and at five geographically distinct local health care systems (Clinical Commissioning Groups, CCGs), identified as having consistently increasing or decreasing inequality. Local settings were explored through discussions with CCG officials and stakeholders to identify potential local determinants. Data were analysed using a realist evaluation approach to generate context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. Results Of the five geographically distinct CCGs, two had narrowing inequality, two widening, and one narrowing inequality, which widened during the project. None of the CCGs had designed a large-scale package of service changes with the explicit aim of reducing socio-economic inequality in avoidable emergency admissions, and local decision makers were unfamiliar with their own trends. Potential primary and community care determinants included: workforce, case finding and exclusion, proactive care co-ordination for patients with complex needs, and access and quality. Potential commissioning determinants included: data use and incentives, and targeting of services. Other potential determinants included changes in care home services, national A&E targets, and wider issues - such as public services financial constraints, residential gentrification, and health care expectations. Conclusions We did not find any bespoke initiatives that explained the inequality trends. The trends were more likely due to an interplay of multiple health care and wider system factors. Local decision makers need greater awareness, understanding and support to interpret, use and act upon inequality indicators. They are unlikely to find simple, cheap interventions to reduce inequalities in avoidable emergency admissions. Rather, long-term multifaceted interventions are required that embed inequality considerations into mainstream decision making.

health policy & services

[Porous corundum ceramics in clinical use].

Effect of temperature on the resonant macroscopic quantum tunneling in small Josephson junctions

Integrating equity frameworks into surgical quality improvement and health administrative databases: A narrative review

Using a health equity lens to measure patient experiences of care in diverse healthcare settings

An equity indicator for assessing mental healthcare access: a national population case study

Through An Equity Lens: Illuminating The Relationships Among Social Inequities, Stigma And Discrimination, And Patient Experiences of Emergency Health Care

Evaluating Equity in Health Financing Using Benefit Incidence Analysis: A Framework for Accounting for Quality of Care

Human Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Cultured as Spheroids are Self‐activated to Produce Prostaglandin E2 that Directs Stimulated Macrophages into an Anti‐inflammatory Phenotype

Sentinels of inequity: examining policy requirements for equity-oriented primary healthcare

Methods to promote equity in health resource allocation in low- and middle-income countries: an overview

Achieving equity within universal health coverage: a narrative review of progress and resources for measuring success

The geometry of GL(2,q) in translation planesof even order q2

Primary care. Where next?

Evaluating engagement with equity in Canadian provincial and territorial primary care policies: Results of a jurisdictional scan

Community design of the Brooklyn Health Equity Index

Composite Indices of Social Determinants of Health: Overview, Measurement Gaps, and Research Priorities for Health Equity

The Silent Scotsman.

Understanding intersectional inequality in access to primary care providers using multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy

Inclusion of Health Equity Initiatives in Hospitals' Strategic Plans

Using measures of quality of care to assess equity in health care funding for primary care: analysis of Indonesian household data

Reducing inequality in avoidable emergency admissions: Case studies of local health care systems in England using a realist approach