Next-generation sequencing-based evaluation of the actionable landscape of genomic alterations in solid tumors: the "MOZART" prospective observational study

Francesco Schettini,Marianna Sirico,Marco Loddo,Gareth H Williams,Keeda-Marie Hardisty,Paul Scorer,Robert Thatcher,Pablo Rivera,Manuela Milani,Carla Strina,Giuseppina Ferrero,Marco Ungari,Cristina Bottin,Fabrizio Zanconati,Nicolò de Manzini,Sergio Aguggini,Richard Tancredi,Elena Fiorio,Antonio Fioravanti,Maurizio Scaltriti,Daniele Generali
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae206
2024-08-23
Abstract:Background: The identification of the most appropriate targeted therapies for advanced cancers is challenging. We performed a molecular profiling of metastatic solid tumors utilizing a comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to determine genomic alterations' type, frequency, actionability, and potential correlations with PD-L1 expression. Methods: A total of 304 adult patients with heavily pretreated metastatic cancers treated between January 2019 and March 2021 were recruited. The CLIA-/UKAS-accredit Oncofocus assay targeting 505 genes was used on newly obtained or archived biopsies. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used where appropriate. Results were significant for P < .05. Results: A total of 237 tumors (78%) harbored potentially actionable genomic alterations. Tumors were positive for PD-L1 in 68.9% of cases. The median number of mutant genes/tumor was 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-3.0). Only 34.5% were actionable ESCAT Tier I-II with different prevalence according to cancer type. The DNA damage repair (14%), the PI3K/AKT/mTOR (14%), and the RAS/RAF/MAPK (12%) pathways were the most frequently altered. No association was found among PD-L1, ESCAT, age, sex, and tumor mutational status. Overall, 62 patients underwent targeted treatment, with 37.1% obtaining objective responses. The same molecular-driven treatment for different cancer types could be associated with opposite clinical outcomes. Conclusions: We highlight the clinical value of molecular profiling in metastatic solid tumors using comprehensive NGS-based panels to improve treatment algorithms in situations of uncertainty and facilitate clinical trial recruitment. However, interpreting genomic alterations in a tumor type-specific manner is critical.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?