Abstract:The protection of patients' personal and medical data has always been an important subject for medical practice, with explicit regulations being implemented. Whether we are talking about civil and criminal codes or laws governing the medical profession, they all seek to protect fundamental human rights. The confidentiality of medical data is maintained even after the death of the patient, this aspect being governed since the profiling of the physician profession through the Hippocratic Oath. Discussions on privacy and confidentiality occupy an important place in sociological, medical, legal, ethical and anthropological literature. There are references to the benefits gained by improving accessibility to data as they migrate to computer environments. Along with the technological evolution, all of this data has been transferred to electronic systems. A major concern with the trend towards electronic health records focuses on protecting privacy and patient confidentiality (Vanderminden and Potter, 2016). Data transfer, as well as their processing through many computer systems belonging to different public and private entities, brings new challenges at the individual and social level. Under the protection afforded by the right of individuals to access to information and the current tendency to ease access to information, a number of institutions have created online portals that manage a huge amount of data. The way these data are processed in accordance with the rights of the individual remains an issue that is not fully resolved. 1 Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania, dum_mihu@yahoo.com Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, Volume 9, Number 1, Summer 2018 2 On the occasion of a doctoral research on medical malpractice, I conducted the interrogation of the portal of Romanian courts (http://portal.just.ro). A huge amount of data can be obtained easily in a short time. In the context of the expected impact of the implementation of the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) in relation to the functioning of the public institutions, I conducted a qualitative research looking at how medical data and personal data are managed by the courts. Decisions of the courts published in the jurisprudence section have been analyzed. The paper analyzes the compliance of the judicial public institutions with the data protection legislation considered in the paradigm of institutional logic. We can assume that the individualistic principle exercised by the professional institution (the medical profession) can conflict and require a balancing with the utilitarian, collective principle, which can explain some of the state institution's actions (courts of justice). GDPR aims to reinforce existing legal provisions. GDPR does not seem to bring about changes in the substance of laws or doctrines on data confidentiality, but appears to be a form of supra-state control. The way in which GDPR will influence policies and practices regarding the processing of personal and medical data will be analyzed with the passage of time.

A Comparative Study of Access Analysis Service Utilization on Japanese Medical Institutions' Websites with GDPR-Compliant Cases

Development of Personal Data Handling Policy in Human Genome Research: a Historical Perspective in Japan

Privacy Matters: Data Breach Litigation in Japan

The Current Status of Secondary Use of Claims, Electronic Medical Records, and Electronic Health Records in Epidemiology in Japan: Narrative Literature Review

Health Care Worker Usage of Large-Scale Health Information Exchanges in Japan: User-Level Audit Log Analysis Study

Privacy Protection in Using Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare: Chinese Regulation in Comparative Perspective

A Study on Privacy Information Protection of Medical Big Data in China

Difficulties in disclosing secondary findings by facilities performing comprehensive germline genetic testing for rare diseases in Japan

A Review of Privacy and Consent Management in Healthcare: A Focus on Emerging Data Sources

Safeguarding Patient Privacy: Exploring Data Protection in E-Health Laws: A Cross-Country Analysis

A Comparative Audit of Privacy Policies from Healthcare Organizations in USA, UK and India

The Development of Japanese Data Protection

Medical Information Protection in Internet Hospital Apps in China: Scale Development and Content Analysis

Comparison of personal information de-identification policies and laws within the EU, the US, Japan, and South Korea

Advancements in the Personal Information Protection System in Japan

Medical Big Data for Research Use: Current Status and Related Issues

Health information seekers in Japan: a snapshot of needs, behavior, and recognition in 2008

Issues in the Adoption of Online Medical Care: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Survey

Analysis of GDPR Compliance in Utilizing Personal Data for Public Health Purposes in Romania

Prerequisites for International Exchanges of Health Information: Comparison of Australian, Austrian, Finnish, Swiss, and US Privacy Policies

Processing of personal and medical data by judicial institutions in the context of the enforcement of Regulation EU 2016/679 – General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)