Assessment of change in antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacteria causing orthopaedic infections by sequential sampling: A prospective cohort study

Ayush Kaushal,Nisha Goyal,Rajesh Arora,Anil K Jain,Narendra Pal Singh,Shukla Das
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102510
2024-07-30
Abstract:Background: Management of Orthopaedic wound infections often depend on isolation of bacteria species (spp.) and its subsequent antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). However, the susceptibility to antibiotics may change over time in the same bacterial spp. particularly after initiation of antibiotic therapy. Repeating AST through sequential sampling can be used for the early detection of changes in antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. However, the recommendations about the optimal frequency of repeat AST for same bacterial spp. isolates from same patient to detect the changes in susceptibility patterns are still not established. Furthermore, no prospective research is available to address the crucial issue. Thus, we aimed this study to evaluate the need of repeat AST through sequential samples from the same site. Methods: AST was performed on same bacterial spp. isolates from three sequential samples using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Considering day 1 as control/baseline, changes in antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was interpreted on two sequential instances (on day 3 and day5). Changes were categorized into favorable & unfavorable and major & minor change categories. Results: The overall change in antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was 28 % on instance 1(on day3) and 36.1 % at instance 2 (on day 5). Susceptible to resistance phenotypic change was 14.9 % at instance 1 and 9.2 % at instance 2.A higher percentage change per case in antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was observed at instance 2. Predominant changes were towards the direction of favorable antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. Conclusion: The risk of change in antimicrobial susceptibility potential was over 10 % at both the instances. Furthermore, it was higher at instance 2 i.e., at day5, therefore a repeat sequential antimicrobial susceptibility testing would be recommended at later instance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?