Abstract:Background and purpose: Adjunctive tirofiban administration in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) has been investigated in several studies. However, the findings are conflict. This study aimed to compare the effect of different administration pathways of tirofiban on patients undergoing EVT for acute LVO with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Methods: Patients were selected from the ANGEL-ACT Registry (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Registry Study) and divided into four groups: intra-arterial (IA), intravenous (IV), and intra-arterial plus intravenous (IA+IV) and non-tirofiban. The primary outcome was 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and the secondary outcomes included the rates of mRS 0–1, 0–2, and 0–3 at 90-day, successful recanalization. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and other safety endpoints. The multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential baseline confounders were performed to compare the outcomes. A propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1:1:1 ratio was conducted among four groups, and the outcomes were then compared in the post-matched population. Results: A total of 502 patients were included, 80 of which were in the IA-tirofiban group, 73 in IV-tirofiban, 181 in (IA+IV)-tirofiban group, and 168 in the non-tirofiban group. The median (IQR) 90-day mRS score in the four groups of IA, IV, IA+IV, and non-tirofiban was, respectively 3(0–5) vs. 1(0–4) vs. 1(0–4) vs. 3(0–5). The adjusted common odds ratio (OR) for 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.45–1.30, P = 0.330), with IV-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 1.36 (95% CI, 0.78–2.36, P = 0.276), and with (IA+IV)-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.64–1.64, P = 0.912). The adjusted OR for mRS 0–1 and mRS 0–2 at 90-day with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was, respectively 0.51 (95% CI, 0.27–0.98, P = 0.042) and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.26–0.94, P = 0.033). The other outcomes of each group were similar with non-tirofiban group, all P was >0.05. After PSM, the common odds ratio (OR) for 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.18–0.94, P = 0.036), and the OR for mRS 0–1 and mRS 0–2 at 90-day with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was, respectively 0.28 (95% CI, 0.11–0.74, P = 0.011) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.09–0.67, P = 0.006). Conclusions: Intra-arterial administration of tirofiban was associated with worse outcome than non-tirofiban, which suggested that intra-arterial tirofiban had a harmful effect on patients undergoing EVT for ICAD-LVO. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

Leukoaraiosis in patients with tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy: A post hoc analysis of a multicentre randomized clinical trial

[Safety of Tirofiban in Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarct Receiving Endovascular Therapy].

Effect of Baseline Infarct Size on Endovascular Thrombectomy with or Without Intravenous Alteplase in Stroke Patients: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Trial (DIRECT-MT).

Association of Functional Outcomes Between Intravenous Tirofiban and Endovascular Thrombectomy in Imaging-Screened Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: a Secondary Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial

Endovascular Thrombectomy with or Without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke

Association Between Leukoaraiosis and Poor Outcome is Not Due to Reperfusion Inefficiency after Intravenous Thrombolysis

Early Tirofiban Administration for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis or Bridging Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract 93: Effect Of Intravenous Tirofiban Following Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy On Functional Outcomes In Large Artery Atherosclerotic Stroke: Secondary Analysis Of A Randomized Clinical Trial

Preoperative and intraoperative tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis

Safety and Efficacy of Adjunct Tirofiban Treatment Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) Resulting in Successful Reperfusion.

Association of Tirofiban With Functional Outcomes After Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Association between intravenous tirofiban and intracranial hemorrhage in acute large vessel occlusion stroke: insight from the RESCUE BT randomized placebo-controlled trial

Association of Intravenous Tirofiban with Functional Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Receiving Endovascular Thrombectomy

The impact of intraarterial, intravenous, and combined tirofiban on endovascular treatment for acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion

Low-Dose Tirofiban Improves Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With Endovascular Thrombectomy

Effects of tirofiban on large vessel occlusion stroke are modified by etiology and renal function

Prospective pilot study of tirofiban in progressive stroke after intravenous thrombolysis

Intraarterial Versus Intravenous Tirofiban as an Adjunct to Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Abstract 100: Endovascular Treatment With Intravenous Tirofiban Or Alteplase Versus Endovascular Treatment Alone For Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Pooled Analysis Of The Devt And Rescue Bt Trials

Predictors of outcome in large vessel occlusion stroke patients with intravenous tirofiban treatment: a post hoc analysis of the RESCUE BT clinical trial

Association of Tirofiban with Improvement of Functional Outcomes of Direct Thrombectomy for Acute Anterior Circulation Occlusion: a Retrospective, Nonrandomized, Multicenter, Real-World Study.