Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic gave rise to countless user-facing mobile apps to help fight the pandemic ("COVID-19 mitigation apps"). These apps have been at the center of data privacy discussions because they collect, use, and even retain sensitive personal data from their users (eg, medical records and location data). The US government ended its COVID-19 emergency declaration in May 2023, marking a unique time to comprehensively investigate how data privacy impacted people's acceptance of various COVID-19 mitigation apps deployed throughout the pandemic. Objective: This research aims to provide insights into health data privacy regarding COVID-19 mitigation apps and policy recommendations for future deployment of public health mobile apps through the lens of data privacy. This research explores people's contextual acceptance of different types of COVID-19 mitigation apps by applying the privacy framework of contextual integrity. Specifically, this research seeks to identify the factors that impact people's acceptance of data sharing and data retention practices in various social contexts. Methods: A mixed methods web-based survey study was conducted by recruiting a simple US representative sample (N=674) on Prolific in February 2023. The survey includes a total of 60 vignette scenarios representing realistic social contexts that COVID-19 mitigation apps could be used. Each survey respondent answered questions about their acceptance of 10 randomly selected scenarios. Three contextual integrity parameters (attribute, recipient, and transmission principle) and respondents' basic demographics are controlled as independent variables. Regression analysis was performed to determine the factors impacting people's acceptance of initial data sharing and data retention practices via these apps. Qualitative data from the survey were analyzed to support the statistical results. Results: Many contextual integrity parameter values, pairwise combinations of contextual integrity parameter values, and some demographic features of respondents have a significant impact on their acceptance of using COVID-19 mitigation apps in various social contexts. Respondents' acceptance of data retention practices diverged from their acceptance of initial data sharing practices in some scenarios. Conclusions: This study showed that people's acceptance of using various COVID-19 mitigation apps depends on specific social contexts, including the type of data (attribute), the recipients of the data (recipient), and the purpose of data use (transmission principle). Such acceptance may differ between the initial data sharing and data retention practices, even in the same context. Study findings generated rich implications for future pandemic mitigation apps and the broader public health mobile apps regarding data privacy and deployment considerations.

Inter-relationships among individual views of COVID-19 control measures across multi-cultural contexts

People's political views, perceived social norms, and individualism shape their privacy concerns for and acceptance of pandemic control measures that use individual-level georeferenced data

How privacy concerns and cultural differences affect public opinion during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study

How Vicarious Experiences Influence Non‐compliance with COVID‐19 Prevention Regulations

Cultural Worldviews and Support for Governmental Management of COVID-19

A context‐sensitive collectivism during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Effect on the adoption of containment measures in China and the US

A Cross-Cultural Study of the Role of Efficacious Beliefs and Perceived Media Effects on Threat Perception in Predicting COVID-19 Compliance in China and the United States

Individualism and the Fight Against COVID-19

The Impact of Pandemic Perception, National Feeling, and Media Use on the Evaluation of the Performance of Different Countries in Controlling COVID-19 by Chinese Residents.

Examining the cultural influence on online stances towards COVID-19 preventive measures and their impact on incidence and mortality: A global stance detection analysis of tweets

Interdependency or submission to authority? The impacts of horizontal and vertical collectivist orientation on vaccine attitudes in mainland China

Examining the Impact of Digital Information Environments, Information Processing, and Presumed Influence on Behavioral Responses to COVID-19 Misinformation in Asia

The Role of Collectivism–Individualism in Attitudes Toward Compliance and Psychological Responses During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Occupation, risk culture, and risk perception: empirical evidence from China on COVID-19

Do National Cultures Matter in the Containment of COVID-19?

Contextual Acceptance of COVID-19 Mitigation Mobile Apps in the United States: Mixed Methods Survey Study on Postpandemic Data Privacy

Desire for Cultural Tightness: the Associated Between COVID-19 Infection Concern and Mental Health and Protective Behavior During- and Post-Covid-19 Lockdown in China

Cross-cultural Research of the Perceived Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Individual costs and community benefits: Collectivism and individuals’ compliance with public health interventions

Competing or Interactive Effect Between Perceived Response Efficacy of Governmental Social Distancing Behaviors and Personal Freedom on Social Distancing Behaviors in the Chinese Adult General Population in Hong Kong

How culture orientation influences the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical analysis