Abstract:Abstract Background Gender inequality within academic medicine and dentistry is a well-recognised issue, but one which is not completely understood in terms of its causes, or interventions to facilitate equality. This systematic review aims to identify, critically appraise, and synthesise the literature on facilitators and barriers to progression through a clinical academic career across medicine and dentistry. It will also explore interventions developed to increase recruitment and retention to clinical academic careers, with a particular focus on gender inequality. Methods The search will cover five databases (MEDLINE (including MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and MEDLINE Daily), Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, and Education Resource Information Center (ERIC)), reference lists, and forward citation searching. We will include studies of doctors, dentists, and/or those with a supervisory role over their careers, with or without an academic career. Outcomes will be study defined, but relate to success rates of joining or continuing within a clinical academic career, including but not limited to success in gaining funding support, proportion of time spent in academic work, and numbers of awards/higher education qualifications, as well as experiences of professionals within the clinical academic pathway. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials, the Newcastle-Ottawa tool for non-randomised studies, and the QARI tool for qualitative studies. Detailed plans for screening, data extraction, and analysis are provided within this protocol. Discussion This systematic review is situated within a larger project evaluating gender inequalities in clinical academic careers. This review will identify and synthetize barriers, facilitators, and interventions addressing gender inequalities in clinical academia. Our findings will increase awareness of inequalities in clinical academic careers through informing clinical academics, regulators and funders of the issues involved, and potential interventions to counteract these. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Systematic review registration Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/mfy7a

Achieving gender equity in academic psychiatry - barriers to involvement and solutions for success

The role of gender as a barrier to the professional development of psychiatrists

Still a 'boys' club': a qualitative analysis of how gender affects a career in anaesthesia in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand

Do Women have More Barriers for Professional Development?

Gender equity in academic dermatology: Problems aplenty, yet paths ahead

Celebrating the accomplishments of thought leaders in psychiatry research: Introduction

Investigation of gender‐based needs in academic otolaryngology

Fixing the leaky pipeline: Tips to promote gender equity in Academic Medicine

Systematic review of interventions to improve gender equity in graduate medicine

'Facilitators and barriers to recruitment in mental health research: A survey of psychiatrists and psychiatry registrars in training'

From female surgical resident to academic leaders: challenges and pathways forward

Perspectives From Students and Faculty on How Women Achieve Leadership Roles in Academic Medicine: An Exploratory Qualitative Study

From the sticky floor to the glass ceiling and everything in between: protocol for a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical academic careers and interventions to address these, with a focus on gender inequality

Eliminating Gender-Based Bias in Academic Medicine: More Than Naming the "Elephant in the Room"

Women faculty: an analysis of their experiences in academic medicine and their coping strategies

Ivory tower in MD/PhD programmes: sticky floor, broken ladder and glass ceiling

Impact of a Women‐focused Professional Organization on Academic Retention and Advancement: Perceptions From a Qualitative Study

Perceptions on gender disparity in surgery and surgical leadership: A multicenter mixed methods study

Satisfaction of Women Faculty in Academic Medicine

Time for a Gut Check: A Qualitative Study of Proposed Interventions to Address Gender Inequality in Gastroenterology

Fellowship for Academic Generalists in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Is It Overdue?