Abstract:BACKGROUND:Graft-derived cell-free DNA (GcfDNA), which is released into the blood stream by necrotic and apoptotic cells, is a promising noninvasive organ integrity biomarker. In liver transplantation (LTx), neither conventional liver function tests (LTFs) nor immunosuppressive drug monitoring are very effective for rejection monitoring. We therefore hypothesized that the quantitative measurement of donor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) would have independent value for the assessment of graft integrity, including damage from acute rejection.METHODS AND FINDINGS:Traditional LFTs were performed and plasma GcfDNA was monitored in 115 adults post-LTx at three German transplant centers as part of a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort trial. GcfDNA percentage (graft cfDNA/total cfDNA) was measured using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), based on a limited number of predefined single nucleotide polymorphisms, enabling same-day turn-around. The same method was used to quantify blood microchimerism. GcfDNA was increased >50% on day 1 post-LTx, presumably from ischemia/reperfusion damage, but rapidly declined in patients without graft injury within 7 to 10 d to a median <10%, where it remained for the 1-y observation period. Of 115 patients, 107 provided samples that met preestablished criteria. In 31 samples taken from 17 patients during biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes, the percentage of GcfDNA was elevated substantially (median 29.6%, 95% CI 23.6%-41.0%) compared with that in 282 samples from 88 patients during stable periods (median 3.3%, 95% CI 2.9%-3.7%; p < 0.001). Only slightly higher values (median 5.9%, 95% CI 4.4%-10.3%) were found in 68 samples from 17 hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive, rejection-free patients. LFTs had low overall correlations (r = 0.28-0.62) with GcfDNA and showed greater overlap between patient subgroups, especially between acute rejection and HCV+ patients. Multivariable logistic regression modeling demonstrated that GcfDNA provided additional LFT-independent information on graft integrity. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 90.3% (95% CI 74.2%-98.0%) and 92.9% (95% CI 89.3%-95.6%), respectively, for GcfDNA at a threshold value of 10%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was higher for GcfDNA (97.1%, 95% CI 93.4%-100%) than for same-day conventional LFTs (AST: 95.7%; ALT: 95.2%; γ-GT: 94.5%; bilirubin: 82.6%). An evaluation of microchimerism revealed that the maximum donor DNA in circulating white blood cells was only 0.068%. GcfDNA percentage can be influenced by major changes in host cfDNA (e.g., due to leukopenia or leukocytosis). One limitation of our study is that exact time-matched GcfDNA and LFT samples were not available for all patient visits.CONCLUSIONS:In this study, determination of GcfDNA in plasma by ddPCR allowed for earlier and more sensitive discrimination of acute rejection in LTx patients as compared with conventional LFTs. Potential blood microchimerism was quantitatively low and had no significant influence on GcfDNA value. Further research, which should ideally include protocol biopsies, will be needed to establish the practical value of GcfDNA measurements in the management of LTx patients.

Role of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA In Predicting Short-term Allograft Health In Liver Transplant Recipients

Prognostic Value of the Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Assay in Acute Renal Rejection Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Dynamics of Early Post-Operative Plasma Ddcfdna Levels in Kidney Transplantation: a Single-Center Pilot Study.

B-234 Evaluating the diagnostic utility of dd-cf-dna in renal allograft surveillance: a single-center perspective

Elevation of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Before Biopsy-proven Rejection in Kidney Transplant

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) for detection of allograft rejection in pediatric kidney transplants

Donor-derived cell-free DNA predicted allograft rejection and severe microvascular inflammation in kidney transplant recipients

Early Monitoring of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Kidney Allograft Recipients Followed-Up for Two Years: Experience of One Center

Combining donor-derived cell-free DNA and donor specific antibody testing as non-invasive biomarkers for rejection in kidney transplantation

Cell-Free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft rejection

Donor-derived cell-free DNA can discriminate acute rejection types after kidney transplantation

The Current State of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Use in Allograft Monitoring in Kidney Transplantation

Donor Plasma Mitochondrial DNA is Correlated with Posttransplant Renal Allograft Function

An Assessment of the Value of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Surveillance in Patients With Preserved Kidney Allograft Function

Liquid biopsies: donor-derived cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft injury

Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA for Personalized Immunosuppression in Renal Transplantation

Graft-Derived Cell-Free Dna, A Noninvasive Early Rejection and Graft Damage Marker in Liver Transplantation: A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter Cohort Study

Donor-derived cell-free DNA: An independent biomarker in kidney transplant patients with antibody-mediated rejection

Plasma Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Levels Are Associated with the Inflammatory Burden and Macrophage Extracellular Trap Activity in Renal Allografts.

Perspective for Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: Defining Context of Use and Clinical Implications

Analysis of the primary factors influencing donor derived cell-free DNA testing in kidney transplantation