Response to Rosen et al. (2014) “Commentary on ‘Critical Flaws in the FSFI and IIEF’”

M. Forbes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.895795
2014-05-14
Abstract:This is a response to the commentary by Rosen, Revicki, and Sand (2014) on our original article titled “Critical Flaws in the Female Sexual Function Index and the International Index of Erectile Function” (Forbes, Baillie, & Schniering, 2014). We address his criticisms and clarify our points further using existing research. We conclude that there are a number of evident limitations to these popular measures, and suggest that researchers and clinicians familiarize themselves with the aim and scope of each measure before use.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?